III. Patterns & Principles

Tetrahedral Nature Of The Cosmos


As emphasized by Haramein, when looking at these ancient symbols and texts, it becomes extraordinarily apparent that something was known long ago in the shadowy thicket of our "recorded" history, a knowledge that seemed to be expressed by a global population or culture that somehow vanished into obscurity, only reaching us today through the remaining monuments, texts and artifacts. Yet, we find hints of this information all over the place, such as this Babylonian Cuneiform clay tablet, being some of the most ancient knowledge on the planet coming to us form the Sumerian era (a civilization of southern Mesopotamia, modern-day southern Iraq). If we look closely at the geometric structure shown in the clay tablet below, a familiar pattern emerges as a series of stacked octahedrons. Importantly, if we rotate a 64-Tetrahedron Grid on its side so that it becomes a square, we find the exact same mapping. (Mesopotamian Slides - Terminology and Geography, California State University, San Marco


(Cuneiform tablet | Rotated 64-Tetrahedron Grid)


We even find confirmation in our modern day; certain phenomena has been occurring over the last few decades and continuing on an steadying curve of complexity and number, appearing in fields all around central England, UK and predominantly located in a huge equatorial triangle centered around Stone Henge, Avebury and Silbury Hill, phenomena that is popularly referred to as 'crop circles.'



There was an enormous amount of controversy surrounding the circles for years, as spectators and scientists alike wondered who was doing them, why were they being done, if they were hoaxes or natural phenomena, there were even scientific papers published on the subject, with some theorizing that they were the results of meteorological vortexes forming the crops into geometric patterns.


However, over time it became evident that these were not the result of natural phenomena, but perhaps someone was trying to communicate something to us through the crops. So, in 1997 a group of crop circle researchers from England figured if someone was trying to tell us something, then maybe we should talk back. It is purported that these individuals went into a field and stomped around in the crops making huge letters that asked the direct question, "WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW?"


Well, the next crop circle that appeared was the largest circle to date at the time, as seen opposite Silbury Hill near Avebury in 1997. This geometric pattern should be familiar by now, it is even made in such a way that is not obviously reproducible because the crops are woven as to replicate the effects of light and shadow that mimics the vertices of 3-dimensional tetrahedrons.


(Silbury hill Crop Circle 1997)


And then a few weeks later there appeared another iteration of the same geometry with the pattern in the center being the exact same pattern as the one on the outside, but with the center going inwards to infinity small. So they were insisting on tetrahedral fractal geometry — infinity in a finite space. Although this crop circle does not directly exemplify the circumscribing boundary condition, it implies the spherical boundaries as shown by the circles within the smaller fractals as well as the outer edges.


(Silbury hill Crop Circle - 2nd iteration 1997)


It seems these crop artists were nice enough to make sure we understood the importance of fractals and that we decode the messages correctly, with this 1991 crop circle depicting the famous Mandelbrot fractal set appearing in a field directly outside Cambridge where Benoit Mandelbrot studied before coining the term 'Fractal' in 1975. Mandelbrot based the description of fractals on the Latin frāctus meaning "broken" or "fractured", and used it to extend the concept of theoretical fractional dimensions to geometric patterns observed in nature.


(Mandelbrot set Crop Circle 1991)


Another crop circle that appeared at Winterbourne Bassett, Wiltshire, UK in July of 1995 was thought at the time to be the most significant crop circle ever to have occurred. Although there are others that are much more intricate and complex, we can see however, that this crop circle is a 2-D representation of a 3-D Vector Equilibrium circumscribed by a sphere, showing the singularity in the center and the boundary condition, telling us that each tetrahedron generates the radiative side of reality.


(Winterbourne Bassett, Vector Equilibrium crop circle)


At first glance crop circles are stunning patterns, yet when we integrate the implications we have ascertained from the study of Unified Physics and the mechanics of spacetime, as posited by Haramein’s Holographic Mass Solution, we find evidence in many of these patterns that confirm everything we have been exploring thus far. There has even been 64 tetrahedron grid crop circles occurring and of course, placing a circle around each of the individual tetrahedrons gives us the well known seed of life or flower of life pattern. Since the mid 1990's these patterns have been appearing all over British and European fields, although England still receives the majority with many occurring near ancients sites.



This massive 780-foot (238 meters) crop circle appeared in 2001 in the remote area of Milk Hill in Wiltshire, England. It is the only crop circle that has ever appeared in mainstream media all across the world. The elaborate design is composed of 409 circles that form a pattern called a double, or six-sided, triskelion, which is a motif consisting of three interlocking spirals.


(Milk Hill Crop Circle 2001)


The reason this is the only crop circle that was ever publicized to the world was because not only was it the biggest circle to have occurred, it also happened at night during the middle of a rain storm, and it rained all night long. In the morning this crop circle was there in the field and basically told the world that not all crop circles are just the result of people stomping around at night with a rope and board apparatus, some crop circles are not immediately reproducible. We see that this pattern is a 2-dimensional representation of a vortex or torus seen in 3-D, in fact, if one applies the principle that there are no 2-D systems in nature, then near all crop circles can be viewed in full three dimensions and we instantly notice how many of them mimic the core foundations attributed to the unified field spacetime structure.



SEE: Crop Circles, from 2D to 3D from the Thrive documentary


Therefore it is of extreme interest to discover that the next crop circle to happen after this one did not make the evening news, most likely because it was too shocking. The next circle to occur was actually a reply to the Arecibo radio telescope message sent in 1974 by famous astronomer named Carl Sagan along with other astrophysicists. They figured that since we had just finished building the Arecibo Observatory they would send a very strong signal into the universe that could reach a far away planet one day. This message could be intercepted by intelligent beings out there in the galaxy so that they could decode the signal and then send a signal back to reach our planet one day.


Although this would take a few thousand years, the radio telescope message was still sent in order to give our far off ancestors a shot at making contact with their neighboring planets and star systems. They decided to send a signal that would be easiest for others to decode, opting for a binary code of ones an zeros like a computer. This numeric sequence can then be transfered to a computer punch card as exemplified below. The binary messaged roughly stated that we're made out of carbon, this is our table of elements, this is our DNA, we have a small head and a big body, we live on the third planet from our Sun and this is the Arecibo radio telescope technology were using to communicate with you. (Arecibo Message, SETI Institute)


(Arecibo radio telescope message 1974)


Then in August of 2001, across from a radio telescope commonly hired by SETI (Nasa's Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) to listen for incoming radio transmissions from Extraterrestrial civilizations, there came two crop circles one of which being a reply to the Arecibo radio telescope message sent in 1974 and the other was what appeared to be a portrait of an alien face. This appeared directly opposite Chilbolton Radio Telescope near Wherwell, Hampshire, which is a highly secure government installation with infrared cameras and security personnel, and no body reported seeing anything unusual. The way the crops are woven are seen to create a negative impression of what is clearly a rather detailed face, showing large eyes, small nose and mouth.


(Chilbolton Crop Circles August 2001)


The reply they printed into the crops is just as astonishing, as it roughly translates stating they are made from carbon and silica, their table of elements is very similar, it says they have a "three strand" DNA structure, its says they have a big head and a small body, they live on three of the planets of the star in their solar system, the third planet has four moons and at the bottom of the reply is a blueprint of the technology their sending back our way.


(Arecibo reply message)


The resolution of this technology is obviously very poor from the size and scale of the crop circle, although it appears the crop artists had already thought about that, because exactly a year prior to this one occurring, in the exact same field, they sent a crop circle which is a larger resolution of the technology at the bottom of their reply, just to make sure we fully understood.


(Chilbolton Crop Circle August 2000 - one year prior)


What do we need to know? Clearly, the importance of fractal tetrahedral geometry spheres, everything described by Haramein's unification of physics. Notice how these spheres are fractalized on the outside, creating smaller iterations, and the spheres on the inside are moving toward singularity at the center.


However, this is by no means compressive or absolute in all the contact we have had from these crop artists, because a year after the Arecibo reply message, a year to the date, in August of 2002 this enormous crop circle appeared, once again produced next to a large communication installation.


(Crabwood, UK Crop Circle 2002)


The woven crops create the image of the side view of an alien head with a big eye, small mouth, holding what appears to be a disk or CD. Seeing as we were using compact disks as a means of data storage at the time, sure enough the disk contains a string of numeric binary code. This binary code was decoded and here's what it says:


"Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts and their BROKEN PROMISES. Much PAIN but still time. BELIEVE. There is GOOD out there. We OPpose DECEPTION. Conduit CLOSING."


Indeed, humanity has seen its fair share of broke promises in our relatively short social evolution. Though certainly this is a positive message for all people working toward more harmonized ways of doing things, with a confirmation that there is "good out there" and therefore reason to be hopeful. The words that are capitalized may reveal an underlying code within this message because they are actually part of the binary sequence. There have been several studies that shed further light with respects to this message. One thing is for certain, this crop circle is not the result of photo editing software, whoever made this image did so by physically weaving the crops in with extraordinary dexterity.


Although these discoveries may at first sound too outrageous to be true, let us consider the possibility that a species from one of the 100 billion planets in our galaxy alone, had already figured out these universal physics and found a planet with another species who were early in their evolution, maybe they would leave little clues to uncover when the time was right, educating a civilization slowly with symbols and markers in the crops near ancient sites. Therefore, the circles may be telling us something very important and fundamental, speaking to us beyond the censorship of governments and giving us a direct communication.


The very fact that we find these same symbols eluded to by the crops in countless iconographic works, literature and scientific pursuits gives further confirmation that some peoples, far back in our past or somewhere else in our galaxy, understood the fundamental structure of the fabric of creation, that we are now rediscovering at this time. The importance of these geometric patterns allows us to visually translate this higher knowledge into a workable communicative dialogue as means of expressing the higher level dynamics at play in the cosmos.


The notion that forms found in sacred geometry can be correlated with the sympathetic points or coordinates of the human body and the larger universe has existed since time immemorial. Johannes Kepler's 1596 astronomical treatise "Mysterium Cosmographicum" (The Cosmographic Mystery) proposed that each of the five Platonic solids could be uniquely inscribed and circumscribed by spherical orbs. By nesting these geometric shapes within one another, each encased inside a sphere, would produce six layers corresponding to the six known planets—Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. By ordering the Platonic solids correctly — octahedron, icosahedron, dodecahedron, tetrahedron, cube — Kepler found that the spheres could be placed at intervals corresponding (within the accuracy limits of available astronomical observations) to the relative sizes of each planet’s orbital relationship to the Sun. (Kepler’s Mysterium Cosmographicum: A Bridge Between Art and Astronomy K.Brecher, Boston University 2011)


(Mysterium Cosmographicum)


Over the years a number of researchers and authors have suggested that the entire universe may have been constructed in accordance with the laws of a hyper-dimensional geometric pattern, all planets being encompassed by this pattern which seemingly governs the location of many sacred sites. At the same time, there is the very ancient belief that all space is filled with an inexhaustible energy, called variously chi, ki, prana, kundalini, vril etc., this energy serving as a dynamic luminiferous aether, and was the foundation of all matter and energy. It has been suggested that this energy flows most strongly in accordance with the vectors of this pattern wrapped around the earth's surface, creating intersecting coordinates typically referred to as ley lines. (The Lore and Lure of Ley Lines, Live Science 2013)


(Earth crystal grid)


Where these lines intersect, we find temples, monuments and sacred structures that signify the importance of the location. In some philosophies, temples were only created to house the Ark of the Covenant, others having a significance to healing or education. Some postulate that each temple is specifically created to preserve a story or legend associated with the site or the religion of that culture. Bruce Cathie, a former airline pilot from New Zealand, developed some of these ideas into a theory suggesting that the Earth and the ancient sacred sites like Giza Egypt, Stonehenge in England and Teotihuacán in south America are sited according to a "world energy grid" based on a hyper-dimensional geometry. (The Energy Grid Harmonic 695 - The Pulse Of The Universe, Bruce Cathie 1997)


Researchers like Carl P. Munck, an ex-air force engineer, who for over ten years had been working on what is called the "global grid" or the "global matrix", unequivocally demonstrates that almost every single pyramid, earthwork and sacred site worldwide uses a simple geometric code to describe its exact position on this world grid. Munck's culminating work concludes that the global grid, which also encompasses everything else within our universe, is specifically connected with tetrahedral mathematics and sacred geometry, demonstrating a clear connection to such extraordinarily diverse and intersecting places on the earths surface such as Nazca Peru, the sites at Avebury and Silbury hill, then again at Guatemala and the Indian mounds of northern America. All of these, and by no means is this list compressive or exhausted, connect with a system of universal mathematics that is both elegant and profound. (The Code - Ancient Advanced Technology and the Global Earth Matrix, Carl Munck 1994)


Further, the Becker-Hagens planetary grid also integrates the Platonic Solids to represent these positions on the earth surface, ascribing their thesis to the work of Ivan P. Sanderson, who was the first to make a case for the structure of an icosahedron (a polyhedron with 20 faces) pattern overlaying the planets surface, creating twelve geometrically distributed geographic areas that are alleged to have the same mysterious qualities popularly associated with the Bermuda Triangle, the Devil's Sea near Japan, and the South Atlantic Anomaly. (The Planetary Grid - A New Synthesis, William Becker and Beth Hagens 2014)


(Becker-Hagens planetary grid)


Drawing a line around the Earth from the Great Pyramid of Giza shows an alignment with other ancient sites that is too accurate to be merely coincidental. Machu Picchu, the Nazca lines, and Easter Island all fall within a margin of error of less than 1/10 of one degree of latitude. Also within that range are Perseopolis, the capital city of ancient Persia; Mohenjo Daro, the ancient capital city of the Indus Valley; and the lost city of Petra. Within one degree of latitude of this line of cohesion is the ancient Sumerian city of Ur, as well as the ancient temple complex of Angkor Wat in Cambodia.


(Left to Right: Giza plateau - Petra - Persepolis - Mohenjo Daro - Eastern Island - Sacsayhuaman - Machu Picchu - Nazca Lines)


Going a step further, there are countless ancient cultures that portray an exceptional understanding of cosmic dynamics as evidenced by the design and orientation of the structures they left behind. The Great Pyramids of Giza in Egypt, the Xi’an Pyramids in China, and the Teotihuacán Pyramids in Mexico all display a significant alignment with three stars in the constellation of Orion, commonly called Orion’s Belt. Did these three cultures all just randomly look up at the sky and pick out their favorite stars as a guide to align their massive megalithic structures in the same manner? That is most likely not the case and suggests that perhaps there is a greater meaning to these alignments still to be discovered.


(Xi’an Pyramids | Teotihuacán Pyramids | Giza Pyramids | Orion’s Belt Constellation)


Now let’s consider the fact that these very same three megalithic sites themselves, relative to each other on the surface of the earth with the addition of the Nazca lines of Peru and the gigantic enigmatic statues of Easter Island, again reproduce an analogue to the stars of the belt in the Orion constellation, but this time in a global relationship.


(Left to Right: Easter Island - Nasa Lines - Giza Pyramids | Teotihuacán - Giza - Xi’an Pyramids)


Clearly this would have to be the work of a planner with global awareness and communication connecting all of these civilizations to a common source. When we examine the folklore of these civilizations, we find a common link. All of them refer to the source of their knowledge, engineering, and science to the influence of “Sun Gods” that came from the stars. In the case of Egypt, the most significant of their gods, Osiris, was typically associated with the Orion constellation or at least one of its stars with other gods representing the others.


In the case of Teotihuacán in Mexico, very little is known about its builders but generally its deities are associated with the Aztec culture. The Aztec sun god "Quetzalcoatl" is described as "the wind and transgressions between the earth and the sky". The famous carving of Pocal Votan found in Palenque, and related as well with Quetzalcoatl, seems to depict a very advanced vehicle being piloted by its occupant.


(Pocal Votan | Artist rendering of the Pocal Votan)


There are many other pyramids found in Mexico such as the pyramids at Chichén Itzá. The Temple of Kukulcan (the main pyramid) demonstrates that its builders were capable of extraordinary astronomical precision, which is made apparent on the spring and fall equinoxes when a shadow of a feathered serpent appears on the northwest balustrade (seen below). The precision of the buildings, the immensity of the task, and the insistence on very specific astronomical alignment found here and at many ancient megalithic structures around the world begins supporting the notion that there is a deep mystery circling our past, one that has vastly more questions than there are answers. For example, why did so many ancient civilizations build very specific geometric structures - namely Pyramids!?


(Temple of Kukulcan, Chichén Itzá, Mexico)


Author and pyramid researcher Peter Tompkins, in the book titled 'Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids' (1976), collates many of the seemingly extraordinary facets revealed by these structures found in Mexico and indeed throughout the world. On pages 280 and 281, there is shown an illustration of a tetrahedron circumscribed by a sphere (as seen below), Tompkins relates this this geometry to a geological survey that was conducted at the ancient site of Teotihuacán near Mexico City. The graphics and text on these pages were a synopsis of the work by American engineer named Hugh Harleston Jr., who had spent some 25 years surveying and mapping many mathematical, geometric and astrological relationships at Teotihuacán.


(Tetrahedron within a sphere - edge vertices intersecting 19.47° latitude)


The following pages provided by Tompkins surmise that after many years of research, spanning 200 archaeological field excursions between 1974-1999, Harleston felt that the main message these ancients were communicating through these monuments was that the physical universe is “tetrahedral” at all scales. As restated by these extracts from Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids:


"Harleston finds it significant that if you stand a tetrahedron on its nose at the South Pole it will form three triangles above the equator at 19.47 latitude, splitting the world into four equilateral great-circle triangles which will exactly divide into areas of 1/3 above and 2/3 below the equator. A Teotihuacán sphere whose diameter is 12 will give an area of 144 π, a quarter of which is an easily reckoned 36 π and so forth. Again all the numbers run in a 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 series unique with a sphere of diameter 12."


"The four points at which the great circle meet, form the nodes of a tetrahedron inscribed in a sphere. This apparently casual relation showed on closer inspection that an extraordinary and unique relation exists between a tetrahedron and a sphere whose diameter is twelve, one from which cosmic data ensues.”


(Pages 280 and 281 Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids)


"The Tetrahedron, simplest of the five Platonic solids, is a perfect Pyramid, a geometrical figure that represents the smallest number of points that will form a solid in three-dimensional space... A tetrahedron whose height is 12 is demonstrated by Harleston to have a side that equals the square root of 216, the length of the base of the Sun Pyramid, which is 6 x 6 x 6 or 6 cubed. The height of an equilateral triangle of 216 base will be the square root of 3 x 6 x 9, or 162, the length of the Moon Pyramid. If a larger tetrahedron is selected so that the sphere exactly fits inside it with the surfaces of the sphere touching the centers of the four faces of the tetrahedron, then the characteristics of the superscribed tetrahedron will be exactly three times the values for the one inscribed within the sphere, and its height twice the diameter of the sphere."


"Pointing out that the carbon atom - which is the basic building block from which the material bodies of all living organisms are made - is a regular tetrahedron, and that the water molecule has characteristics that conform to the tetrahedral structure, Harleston concludes that the fundamental message conveyed by the Teotihuacános is that the physical universe is tetrahedral from the microscopic level of the atom all the way up to the macroscopic level of the galaxies on a scale of vibrations in which man stands at about the center. Man would thus have built into him, as suggested by Pythagoras and Plato, the tool for unlocking the geometry of the cosmos and recovering the knowledge of his role in the scheme."


So, here we find direct evidence that the ancient builders at Teotihuacán were specifically aware of the structure of creation that we are exploring through the field of Unified Physics today. In fact, Harleston, after meticulously surveying the monuments discovered that each of the pyramids at the site, in their varying sizes and placements, were in fact a terrestrial map describing all the orbits of the planets in our solar system, including Pluto and Neptune, which were not found until the 1800-1900s by the observatory in Fairfax, Arizona. So how did these people thousands of years ago have these orbits plotted using the geometry of the pyramids and their positioning? Why were they so precisely aligned to astronomical events? And exactly how were these massive structures constructed in ancient times? (Mayan Treasure: Space and Time Unified at Teotihuacán - Research Summary: 1971-2006 by Hugh Harleston, Jr.)


(Teotihuacán: A Maya Time-Map of the Solar System)


Remarkably, not only does the ancient city of Teotihuacán express in its mathematics the structure of a tetrahedron inside a sphere, but if one were to physically place a tetrahedron in a sphere the size of the Earth - so that one vertex (point) is at the south pole, then the other vertices will intersect at 19.5° (19.47) north latitude, which actually aligns closely with the location of Teotihuacán on the Earths surface.


(Teotihuacán 19.47° latitude on Earths surface)


In recent years, many of these findings have been further developed by former adviser to NASA and White House staff, Richard C. Hoagland. According to Hoagland, everything in our universe possesses a hyper-dimensional-tetrahedral-toroidal energy field, and planets are no exception. Within a sphere, the points of the star-tetrahedron intersect the edges of its circumference at approximately 19.47 - 19.5 degrees latitude. Hence at these latitudes we find the massive volcanoes on Mars, the great red spot of Jupiter, the two volcanoes on Venus, a dark spot on Neptune, dark cloud bands on Saturn, sun spots on the Sun, and the volcanoes of Hawaii.


(19.47° - 19.5°: Mars Olympus Mons - Jupiter's red vortex - Neptune’s dark vortex - Sunspots)


Hoagland notes, that if a regular tetrahedron of the right size existed within a sphere the size of the spinning Earth, and one of its vertices were at the South Pole, then the other three vertices would be spaced 120° apart, some 19.5° north of the equator. This is why we find major upwellings of energy that seem to cluster within a degree or two of locations at this latitude, like the immense Hawaiian volcanoes on Earth and the Olympus Mons volcano on Mars (the highest and most massive mountain in the Solar System), and other such phenomena that occurs either north or south of the equator depending on the planet.


(Hyper-dimensional spacetime geometry: two counter rotated tetrahedrons within a sphere)


To illustrate this point further, there are two mysterious hexagons surrounding the north pole of the planet Saturn; the main one is 15,000 miles across and per infrared photos, extends at least sixty miles down into the planet's interior. It does not move with the wind driven clouds, but rotates every ten hours and thirty nine minutes, as do Saturn's radio emissions. Physicists and astronomers currently have no explanation for any of this, although Hoagland suggests that two interlocking hyper-tetrahedrons projecting down into three dimensional space would produce such a hexagon.


(Saturn’s north pole: counter rotating hexagonal clouds)


The term "hyper-dimensional" is referring to dynamics taking place beyond our three-dimensional world, in effect creating geometric shadows that appear to us as the enigmatic phenomena associated with Saturn's hexagonal pole and Jupiter's red votex etc. Hoagland's position is that much of the energy of the Sun and other stars comes not from the fusion of hydrogen, but from a "universal energy" from a higher, hyper-dimensional source of two interlocked, counter rotating tetrahedrons, and that the energy in stars and planets (the intensity of their magnetic fields) seems to correlate at least roughly with their angular momentum.


Hoagland's insight into hyper-dimensional physics began with his early research of the mysterious and some what controversial monument known as "The Face on Mars". In 1976, during the unmanned Viking Orbiter mission to mars, a photo was captured of the northern part of the Martian desert called Cydonia. Nasa, Hoagland and indeed much of the worlds population, spotted an enigmatic artifact that did not belong - the so-called face on Mars. The official response from Nasa when it was first presented to the media was that it was in fact simply a trick of light and shadow and nothing more.


(Face on Mars - Viking orbiter image)


If there was only one such picture, then this could merely be attributed to a simple phenomena resulted by the orbiters camera. However, a second frame of the same location was then captured thirty five days later from an alternative angle. Yet again we find the same, very clear and distinct appearance of a humanoid face that appears to be remarkably bilaterally symmetrical, meaning that it has a very definite left half and right half. As we can see in the image below, there appear to be two eye sockets, the mouth joins up, the hair line or headdress appears to go around the forehead, showing about a 95% proportional symmetry.


(Second orbiter image)


Over many years, Hoagland and his team created various computer simulated 3D reconstructions of the monument utilizing the images provided by the Viking satellite and the collected data. The incredible level of detail shown by these images offers unequivocal proof that this monument is far more than a natural formation. During the past decade or so, the reality of this structure being a genuine artifact has now become more or less accepted in the mind of the dedicated researcher, although official confirmation is still to be made. Thus, the focus for Hoagland and his team instead began looking less at whether this structure was real or not, and focused more at the meaning behind such an object, including the possible connection it may have with the Earth.


(3-D reconstruction of the Martian face)


This initial inquiry compelled his team to look for further evidence of an intelligent intervention on the planet, they were soon to discover that very near to the face was what appeared to be a collection of strikingly obvious “pyramidal forms” protruding out of the Cydonian landscape. What is even more interesting about these structures is that they lay at a perfect 90° angle, pointing directly toward to the center line of the Martian face. Hoagland, in former briefings with Nasa, concluded that the most extraordinary region of Cydonia turned out not to be the face after all, but a two mile long, half mile high, five sided pyramid located a few miles away on the plateau, named the 'D&M pyramid.' (D&M Pyramid on Mars, MegaEssays


(D&M Pyramid, Cydonia plateau)


The team found when measuring the internal geometry of the D&M pyramid, that it contained incredible geometric structure representing fundamental mathematical constants, which in the universe are key to signifying the presence of intelligence. The reconstructed model of the D&M pyramid yields a unique mathematical significance to us here on Earth, including pi, phi and relationships pertinent to scared geometry, but importantly, the most pronounced value that underlies this pyramid comes in the form of the familiar tetrahedral angle, of 19.5 degrees — the intersection points of a tetrahedron within a sphere. Moreover, when the relationships between all the monuments on Cydonia were measured, the team discovered the exact same identical geometry to the D&M pyramid represented again, on a larger fractal scale, revealing the significant value of 19.5° throughout the entire plateau.


(D&M Pyramid encoding 19.5° tetrahedral mathematics)


The data uncovered from Cydonia implies that the same angles, the same geometries, the same relationships and indeed the same message decoded from the D&M pyramid, has been repeated over and over redundantly throughout the entire complex signifying the tetrahedral relationship. Hoagland asserts, that if there were a deliberate meaning behind the incredible geometry displayed by the monuments of Mars, it may very well be the specific message regarding the tetrahedral nature of the cosmos. (The Monuments of Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever, Richard C. Hoagland 1987)


(The Redundant Tetrahedral Geometry of Cydonia. Credit: R.H Hoagland)


Certainly, there is at least some evidence supporting the significance of 19.5 degrees on the latitudes of these planets. The observed up-swellings of energy that form at these locations, specifically earthquake faults and the rift zones that separate the Earth's tectonic plates, are indicative of the roiling vorticular dynamics described by Hoagland, Haramein, Fuller and countless others throughout history, being the result of a hyper-extended spacetime topology in its natural motion, ordinarily hidden from our immediate attention.


It is interesting to find that most of the known early developments of human culture, including the first known civilizations and the development of the major religions, were created in or near these zones or (as in the case of Egypt) along earthquake faults parallel to these rifts. Clearly, this needs to be investigated, but we have to remember that the known cultures attributed to these locations, were almost certainly not the first to inhabit them.


If we are to make a connection to a geometry given to us by the worlds many sacred sites, traditions, pyramids and the monuments of Mars, we find they are speaking of a physics that applies not just to the planets, but to the Universe at large. The reality of this fundamental tetrahedra relationship, coming to us from civilizations that far preceded our own time, may indeed be confirming the true underlying structure of the fabric (or super-fluid) of the cosmos. Yet, we must consider how this knowledge reached humanity in the first place and why it became so heavily shrouded in the religions and mystery traditions of the world.


Could it be that the ancient inhabitants knew something that was subsequently forgotten, or even withheld over the millennia? Could it be that they had technologies that we’re just now at the threshold of rediscovering that enabled them to build and align megalithic structures with such impeccable precision? And could they, perhaps, have left us these visual clues so that one day we would “remember” them and re-establish an understanding of cosmic forces that will endow us with the same capacity of evolutionary progression. In order to have a whole understanding of Unified Physics, it is important to be aware of both the fundamental patterns that inform the fractal dynamics of spacetime, as well as how the knowledge of these patterns has been present for thousands of years as evidenced by innumerable artifacts.