Description
FORMULATION OF SECl MUTATED PROTEIN AND METHOD FOR FORMULATION OF THE SAME
Technical Field
[1] The present invention relates to a formulation of a Staphylococcal enterotoxin Cl
(SECl) mutant protein, one of toxins of Staphylococcus aureus, exhibiting prevention, symptom alleviation and excellent therapeutic effects of mastitis via an improved immune function of lactating or non-lactating dairy cows and a method for formulating the same. More specifically, the present invention relates to a formulation of an SECl mutant protein comprising an effective amount of an SECl mutant protein, a protein- stabilizing excipient, a carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient, a lipophilic material, and a biocompatible oil and/or a fatty acid ester-based compound, by which the SECl mutant protein can be easily administered via injection and efficacy and stability thereof are maximized, and a method for formulating the same. Background Art
[2] Staphylococcal enterotoxin C 1 (SEC 1 ) mutant protein, a toxin of Staphylococcus aureus, is a protein in which cysteine, an amino acid at a position 95 of a mutant toxin Cl of Staphylococcus aureus, was substituted with serine, and is known to have a probability of effective application thereof as a vaccine inducing promotion of nonspecific cellular immunity as well as antibody production of specific humoral immunity (Terence N. Turner et al (1992), Infection and Immunity 62(2), pp 694-697; Carolyn J. Hovde et al (1994), Molecular Microbiology 13(5), pp 897-909; and Marcy L. Hoffann et al (1994), Infection and Immunity 62(8), pp 3396-3407). A method for preparing an SECl mutant protein is disclosed in Korean Patent No. 382239, Australian Patent No. 2001-11759 and the like.
[3] The SECl mutant protein exhibiting such prevention, symptom alleviation and therapeutic effects of mastitis, as disclosed in Korean Patent No. 382239, can be mass- produced using Escherichia coli as a host. However, similar to other protein medicines, the SECl mutant protein also suffers from problems associated with maintenance of protein stability such as protein denaturation upon long-term storage (more than 2 weeks) and aggregation of protein in dispersion media (for example, oil). In addition, the SECl mutant protein, like ordinary proteins, is also labile to heat, pH, salts and organic solvents (Weiqi Lu et al. PDA L. Pharm. Sci. Tech. 49, 13-19 (1995)).
[4] Meanwhile, Korean Patent No. 359252, assigned to the present applicant, discloses a method for preparing microparticles of SECl mutant protein using 3% car- boxymethylcellulose and 2% lecithin via spray drying. However, such a method
suffers from several problems as follows. That is, preparation of the SECl mutant protein by means of spray drying exhibits a low yield of about 10 to 30% and thus is not suitable for commercialization via industrial-scale production. In addition, during a spray drying process, the SECl mutant protein is exposed to a high internal temperature of 50 to 70°C which may cause denaturation of the protein. As such, there is a need for development of a formulation capable of achieving effective in vivo delivery of the SECl mutant protein after administration thereof while maintaining the protein at a stable state for a sufficient period of time even when exposed to an external environment, and development of a technique for large-scale production of the SECl mutant protein.
[5] Therefore, a great deal of research has been made toward formulation of the SECl mutant protein into solid microparticles utilizing biodegradable polyesters, for example polyglycolide and polylactide and polymers thereof. Such formulations exhibit protection effects of active drug against degrading enzymes in the body and sustained efficacy of the drug for a predetermined period of time, thus capable of further maximizing effects thereof. However, since biodegradable polymers are soluble only in organic solvents upon performing a formulation process, thus causing severe denaturation of proteins which in turn leads to difficulty of practical application thereof. In addition, many attempts have been made into formulations for oral administration using liposome as another type of formulation, but such formulations exhibit disadvantages such as instability of a particle structure and being non-economic as animal preparations, thus failing to achieve practical application thereof. Disclosure of Invention Technical Problem
[6] Therefore, the present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and other technical problems that have yet to be resolved.
[7] The present inventors have conducted a variety of extensive and intensive study and experimentation to solve problems as described above and have found that an SECl mutant protein formulation, comprising an effective amount of an SECl mutant protein as an active ingredient, and prepared by mixing the SECl mutant protein with a protein-stabilizing excipient containing particular ingredients, a carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient and a lipophilic material to prepare solid microparticles and dispersing the resulting microparticles in a biocompatible oil and/or a fatty acid ester- based compound (a dispersion medium), can prevent denaturation occurring upon long-term storage of the SECl mutant protein in a solution state, aggregation in the dispersion media and instability of the protein due to a variety of external factors, and is capable of achieving prevention, symptom alleviation and maximized therapeutic
effects of mastitis in the body as well as commercialization thereof via industrial-scale production. The present invention has been completed based on these findings.
[8] Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a formulation which is capable of easily administering a water soluble SECl mutant protein via injection while maintaining stability thereof and is capable of maintaining activity of the protein for a prolonged period of time in vivo when it is administered.
[9] It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing such a formulation enabling commercialization thereof via effective industrial-scale production.
Technical Solution
[10] In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the above and other objects can be accomplished by the provision of an SECl mutant protein formulation comprising solid microparticles containing 0.001 to 50% by weight of a Staphylococcal enterotoxin Cl (SECl) mutant protein, one of toxins of Staphylococcus aureus, as an active ingredient, 0.1 to 90% by weight of a protein-stabilizing excipient, 0.1 to 90% by weight of a carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient and 0.1 to 10% by weight of a lipophilic material, dispersed in a biocompatible oil and/or a fatty acid ester-based compound.
[11] The formulation in accordance with the present invention is particularly suitable for injection and exhibits long-lasting efficacy and excellent stability of the drug.
[12] The SECl mutant protein, as described hereinbefore, is an active ingredient exhibiting excellent effects on prevention, symptom alleviation and treatment of mastitis of dairy cows, via an improved immune function of lactating or non-lactating dairy cows, and can be prepared by various methods known in the art. The content of the active ingredient, as defined above, is in the range of 0.001 to 50% by weight, based on the weight of solid microparticles. Where the content of the active ingredient is too low, it is difficult to exert pharmacological effects thereof. In contrast, where the content of the active ingredient is too high, it may cause occurrence of aggregation and denaturation thereof in water-insoluble solvents. More preferably, the content of the active ingredient is in the range of 0.01 to 20% by weight.
[13] In order to enhance physicochemical stability of the water-soluble mutant protein and in order to prepare stabilized solid microparticles, the formulation in accordance with the present invention contains various specific ingredients.
[14] Among such ingredients, the protein-stabilizing excipient is an ingredient which enables formation of the active ingredient SECl mutant protein into particles while maintaining stability thereof.
[15] In order to confirm excipients which enables preparation of the SECl mutant protein into stabilized solid microparticles, the present inventors have selected feasible excipient candidates from a various kinds of excipients known to have protein stabilizing effects and have carried out confirmation experiments on whether these excipient candidates have effects on formation of solid microparticles and protein stabilization. Taking into consideration problems exhibited by spray drying micro- granulation, a microgranulation process was carried out via lyophilization.
[16] TABLE 1 below shows whether solid microparticles are formed or not when lyophilizing a mixture of the SECl mutant protein and excipients, and experimental results on percentage change in protein purity when the formulation containing such solid microparticles dispersed in oil was stored under room temperature conditions (25°C, 60% RH) and under severe conditions (40°C, 75% RH) for 4 weeks, respectively. In addition, for comparison, TABLE 1 also shows the results obtained when the water-soluble SECl mutant protein alone was dispersed in oil.
[17] [TABLE 1]
[18]
[19] As can be seen from TABLE 1, silica and calcium phosphate, among excipients used in experiments, have failed to form solid microparticles of water-soluble SECl mutant protein. Among solid microparticle-forming excipients, sodium chloride and polyethyleneglycol 8000 exhibited the best stability on the SECl mutant protein. Meanwhile, lactose, triblock copolymer (Pluronic), polymethyl methacrylate, glucose, sugar and tetramethylglucose generally exhibit excellent stability on the SECl mutant protein.
[20] As can be seen from the above results, examples of the preferred protein-stabilizing excipients that can be used in the formulation of the present invention include, but are not limited to, sodium chloride, polyethyleneglycol (for example, PEG 8000), dis- accharides (for example, lactose, maltose and sucrose), glucose, tetramethylglucose, Pluronic (a triblock copolymer) and any combination thereof. Inter alia, polyethyleneglycol is more preferable and a mixture of polyethyleneglycol and sodium
chloride is particularly preferable.
[21] As previously defined, the content of protein-stabilizing excipient is in the range of
0.1 to 90% by weight, based on the weight of solid microparticles. Where the content of the excipient is too low, it is difficult to exert effects due to addition thereof. In contrast, where the content of the excipient is too high, it may cause damage to proteins during a lyophilization process and occurrence of aggregation and de- naturation of particles in water-insoluble solvents after lyophilization. More preferably, the content of the excipient is in the range of 30 to 60% by weight.
[22] As another ingredient used in the formulation in accordance with the present invention, the carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient serves to maximize im- munopotency of the active ingredient SECl mutant protein while assisting action of the protein-stabilizing excipient. Examples of the carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipients utilizable in the present invention include, but are not limited to, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, chitosan, alginate, xylose, galactose, fructose, saccharose, dextran, chondroitin sulfate and any combination thereof. Among other things, particularly preferred is carboxymethyl cellulose.
[23] The content of the carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient, as previously defined, is in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight, based on the weight of solid microparticles. Where the content of the auxiliary excipient is too low, it is difficult to exert effects due to addition thereof. In contrast, where the content of the auxiliary excipient is too high, this may lead to failure of formation of solid particles during a lyophilization process. More preferably, the content of the auxiliary excipient is in the range of 0.5 to 50% by weight.
[24] Meanwhile, lipophilic materials may be added to the formulation in accordance with the present invention. The lipophilic materials serve to improve dispersibility of microparticles containing the active ingredient SECl mutant protein, thereby improving injectability of the formulation. Examples of the lipophilic materials that can be used in the present invention include, but are not limited to, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine, lecithin, phosphatidylcholine-based materials (for example, stearoyl phosphatidylcholine and arachidonyl phosphatidylcholine), myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, sorbitan monooleate, polysorbate, glyceryl stearate, sorbitan palmitate, sorbitan stearate and any combination thereof. Particularly preferred are phosphatidylcholine-based materials.
[25] The content of the lipophilic material, as previously defined, is in the range of 0.1 to 10% by weight, based on the weight of solid microparticles. Where the content of the lipophilic material is too low, it is difficult to sufficiently exert addition effects thereof. In contrast, where the content of the lipophilic material is too high, this may
lead to failure of formation of solid particles after completion of lyophilization. The content of the lipophilic material is preferably in the range of 0.1 to 5% by weight.
[26] As one of media (dispersion media) capable of dispersing the solid microparticles containing the SECl mutant protein, protein-stabilizing excipient, carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient and lipophilic material to make an injectable formulation, the biocompatible oils that can be used in the present invention preferably include, but are not limited to, edible oil, mineral oil, squalene, squalane, mono-, di- and triglyceride, and any combination thereof. Examples of edible oils include soybean oil, corn oil, olive oil, safflower oil, cottonseed oil, peanut oil, sesame oil and sunflower oil. Particularly preferred is soybean oil.
[27] As another material that can be used as a dispersion medium of solid microparticles, the fatty acid ester-based compound preferably include, but is not limited to, monoglyceride, diglyceride, triglyceride, isopropylpalmitate, isopropylmyristate, benzoic acid, ethyl linoleate and any combination thereof. Particularly preferred is isopropylmyristate.
[28] The biocompatible oils and fatty acid ester-based compounds may be used, alone or in combination. Combined use thereof as the dispersion medium is more preferable in terms of improved injectability and maximized dispersion effects. This fact can also be confirmed from the results of Experimental Example 3 which will be illustrated hereinafter. In particular, among biocompatible oils and fatty acid ester-based compounds, combined use of soybean oil and isopropylmyristate provides better injectability of the formulation.
[29] Upon combined use, the content of the biocompatible oil may be, for example, in the range of 1 to 99% by weight, based on the total weight of the dispersion medium. In this connection, when isopropylmyristate is used as the fatty acid ester-based compound, the content thereof is in particular preferably in the range of 20 to 40% by weight.
[30] An amount of microparticles added relative to the dispersion medium may be determined taking into consideration an optimal single-injection dose, injectability of the dispersion and the like and is preferably in the range of 1 to 99% by volume on the basis of the total volume. If necessary, it is possible to use the formulation in which the above dispersion was re-dispersed in physiological saline.
[31] Meanwhile, other ingredients known in the art may be further added to the formulation in accordance with the present invention within a range they do not damage effects of the invention and it should be construed that those ingredients are also encompassed within the scope of the present invention.
[32] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for preparing an SECl mutant protein formulation, comprising:
[33] (a) mixing an SECl mutant protein, a protein-stabilizing excipient, a carbohydrate- based auxiliary excipient and a lipophilic material;
[34] (b) lyophilizing the resulting mixture to prepare solid microparticles; and
[35] (c) dispersing the solid microparticles in a biocompatible oil and/or a fatty acid ester-based compound.
[36] In step (b), solid microparticles are fabricated to have a particle diameter of about 5 to 200 D. Where the particle diameter is too small, aggregation of microparticles occurs, thus making it difficult to achieve sufficient dispersion and leading to deterioration of sustained-release properties of the active ingredient. Conversely, where the particle diameter is too large, precipitation of microparticles occurs in the dispersion medium, thus undesirably making it difficult to maintain the dispersed state.
[37] A lyophilizing method for preparing the microparticles is well known in the art and therefore details thereof will be omitted herein. Brief Description of the Drawings
[38] The above and other objects, features and other advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
[39] FIG. 1 is a graph showing results of determination on γ-IFN levels in blood collected after injection of formulations of Examples and Comparative Examples into mice, respectively, using a mouse cytokine ELISA kit;
[40] FIG. 2 is a graph showing results of determination on changes in the number of somatic cells in milk collected prior to administration, and 2, 4, 6 and 10 weeks post administration, a total of five times, following injection of a formulation of Example 1 into lactating dairy cows having more than 510 somatic cells/ml of milk; and
[41] FIG. 3 is a graph showing results of determination on the number of somatic cells in milk collected after injection of a formulation of Example 1 and Lavac Staph™ ( Staphylococcus Aureus Bacterin)(Boehringer Ingelheim) into lactating dairy cows having more than 5x10 somatic cells/ml of milk, respectively. Mode for the Invention
[42] Now, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following examples. These examples are provided only for illustrating the present invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope and spirit of the present invention.
[43]
[44] Examples 1 through 10 and Comparative Examples 1 through 4: Preparation of
SECl mutant protein formulations
[45] SECl mutant protein formulations were prepared according to the following
formula given in TABLE 2 below. For example, in Example 1, an SECl mutant protein, sodium chloride, carboxymethylcellulose and phosphatidylcholine were mixed together, the resulting mixture was lyophilized to prepare solid microparticles having an average particle diameter of about 50 to 80 D, and the solid microparticles were dispersed in soybean oil, thereby preparing a desired formulation.
[46] [TABLE 2]
[47]
[49]
[50] Experimental Example 1: Stability of formulation containing injectable SECl mutant protein
[51] In order to confirm whether the SECl mutant protein in the formulation exhibits in vivo activity upon using formulations of Examples 1 through 3 and Comparative Examples 1 through 3 as injectable formulations, experiments were carried out using mice as follows. Specifically, each formulation was added to soybean oil such that a concentration of the SECl mutant protein was diluted to 40 D. The diluted formulations were intraperitoneally injected into 4-week old, male Balb/c mice and blood was collected 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 days post-administration. Thereafter, γ-IFN levels in blood thus collected were determined using a mouse cytokine ELISA kit. The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 1.
[52] As can be seen from FIG. 1, until 24 days after administration of formulations, much higher values of γ-IFN in conjunction with excellent sustainability were observed in order of Example 1, Example 3 and Example 2, as compared to the case in which 40 D of a raw material alone was administered. Whereas, Comparative Example
1 showed a significant increase in the value of γ-IFN until 8 days of administration, but exhibited tendency of a decrease in the value of γ-IFN after 8 days. Upon comparing the results between Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, it can be seen that the carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient, carboxymethylcellulose maximizes immunopo- tentiating effects of the SECl mutant protein in vivo. In addition, upon comparing the results between Example 1 and Comparative Examples 2 and 3, formulations of Comparative Examples 2 and 3 exhibited an increase in the value of γ-IFN up to 8 days of administration, followed by a sharp decrease, thus representing that the composition of the present invention is essential for stability of the SECl mutant protein.
[53] [54] Experimental Example 2: Injectability of formulation containing injectable SECl mutant protein
[55] In order to quantitatively evaluate whether solid microparticles containing the SECl mutant protein of the present invention were homogeneously dispersed in a nonaqueous solution or a mixed solution of a non-aqueous solution and an aqueous solution, a force applied at the time of injection using a syringe (injectability) was measured for the respective formulations (dispersions). Specifically, when pushing syringes (a 18 gauge needle), each having filled with 3 ml of respective dispersions, at a constant speed of 80 mm/min, the force necessary to extrude the contents from syringe (injectability) was measured on day 0 and day 28 of storage, respectively. For comparison, soybean oil was used as a control. In addition, a formulation in which phosphatidylcholine alone was excluded from composition ingredients of Example 1 was separately prepared and used as Comparative Example 4. Injectability of these dispersions are given in TABLE 3 below.
[56] [TABLE 3] [57]
[58] As can be seen from TABLE 3, among 28-day dispersions after storage of formulations, dispersions of Examples 1 through 3 and Comparative Example 1 exhibited excellent dispersibility and thus were easily injected similar to soybean oil as the
control. Whereas, dispersions of Comparative Examples 2 and 3 were shown to suffer from difficulty of injection or being not injectable (non-injectability). In particular, it can be seen that the dispersion containing no lipophilic material used in the present invention (Comparative Example 4) was not injectable.
[59]
[60] Experimental Example 3: Injectability of formulation containing injectable SECl mutant protein
[61] Experimental conditions were the same as in Experimental Example 2 and injectability of the respective dispersions was measured 0 and 24 weeks after storage thereof, respectively. For comparison, the results on injectability of the respective dispersions are shown in TABLE 4 below, using the formulation of Example 1, and formulations of Examples 4 through 6 in which soybean oil and isopropylmyristate were mixed.
[62] [TABLE 4] [63]
[64] As can be seen from TABLE 4, among 24- week dispersions after storage of formulations, dispersions of Examples 4 through 6 exhibited significantly improved effects in injectability and dispersibility of Example 1. Based on the results thus obtained, it can be seen that combination of the biocompatible oil (in particular, soybean oil) with the fatty acid ester-based compound provides further improved injectability. In particular, when the fatty acid ester-based compound is isopropylmyristate, it can be said that use of isopropylmyristate in an amount of 20 to 40% by weight based on the total weight of the dispersion medium provides more preferred results.
[65] [66] Experimental Example 4: Stability of injectable SECl mutant protein with respect to addition concentration of sodium chloride
[67] TABLE 5 below presents protein contents determined when formulations, prepared by lyophilizing a mixture of an SECl mutant protein and excipients to obtain solid mi- croparticles and dispersing the solid microparticles in oil, were stored under room temperature conditions (25°C, 60% RH) and under severe conditions (40°C, 75% RH) for 24 weeks, respectively. In addition, for comparison of changes in protein contents between the respective formulations with respect to contents of sodium chloride, the
results for protein contents in formulations of Examples 7 through 10 in conjunction with Example 1 are set forth in TABLE 5.
[68] [TABLE 5]
[69]
Contents Of SECI mutant protein (%)
0 time RT conditions Severe conditions
Ex. 1 98 98 97
Ex. 7 97 94 89
Ex. 8 98 95 90
Ex. 9 98 85 74
Ex. 10 99 82 65
[70] As can be seen from TABLE 5, the formulation of Example 1 exhibited stable results without changes in protein contents for 24 weeks under room temperature conditions and under severe conditions, while the formulations of Example 7 through 10 exhibited a tendency of decreases in protein contents. These results represent that the content of sodium chloride constituting solid microparticles of SECl mutant protein affects stability of the protein. Therefore, it can be seen that the particularly preferred content of sodium chloride is less than 60% by weight when sodium chloride is used as the protein-stabilizing excipient. Nonetheless, the above experimental results have confirmed that formulations of the present invention including the formulations of Example 7 through 10 generally ensure excellent stability of the SECl mutant protein even when they are stored under severe conditions (40°C, 75% RH) for a prolonged period of time (24 weeks).
[71] [72] Experimental Example 5: Antibody-producing ability of formulation containing injectable SECl mutant protein
[73] Based on the results of Experimental Example 1, in order to examine biological activity of the SECl mutant protein upon intraperitoneal administration of a formulation of Example 1 into subject animals, 0.3 ml (40 D) of a diluted formulation, prepared by 10-fold diluting 0.3 ml (400 D) of the formulation of Example 1 in soybean oil, and 0.03 ml (4 D) of a diluted formulation, prepared by 100-fold diluting 0.3 ml (400 D) of the formulation of Example 1 in soybean oil, were administered to mice via intraperitoneal injection at intervals of 2 weeks, thrice. 14 days after the first, second and third administration, respectively, blood was collected from mice (10 animals/ administration) followed by isolation of sera, and the titer of antibody specific for SECl mutant protein was analyzed using peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (ICN. #55550). The results thus obtained are given in TABLE 6 below.
OD(A450 to A650 nm)
[76] As can be seen from TABLE 6, the formulation of Example 1 exhibited excellent antibody-producing ability with respect to contents of the SECl mutant protein in mice in vivo.
[77] [78] Experimental Example 6: Somatic cell-reducing effects of formulation containing injectable SECl mutant protein
[79] As a somatic experiment of subject animals in order to verify immunopotentiating effects in dairy cows, a formulation of Example 1 was administered to 295 lactating dairy cows having more than 5x10 somatic cells/ml of milk via intramuscular injection and milk was collected 0, 2, 4, 6 and 10 weeks after administration of the formulation, a total of five times. Changes in the number of somatic cells in the collected milk were measured. The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 2.
[80] As can be seen from FIG. 2, the formulation of Example 1 has continuously exhibited reduction effects of somatic cells in milk, starting from 4 weeks of administration up to 10 weeks.
[81] [82] Experimental Example 7: Comparison for somatic cell-reducing effects of formulation containing injectable SECl mutant protein
[83] This example is a somatic experiment of subject animals for comparison and verification of immunopotentiating effects of a formulation of Example 1 in dairy cows. For this, Lavac Staph™, a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine against mastitis in dairy cows (available from Boehringer Ingelheim), was used as a Comparative Example. Experiment was carried out using 295 lactating dairy cows having more than 5x105 somatic cells/ml of milk. The formulation of Example 1 was intramuscularly injected into 278 dairy cows and the comparative formulation was intramuscularly injected into 17 dairy cows. Thereafter, milk was collected and the number of somatic cells in the milk was measured. The results thus obtained are shown in FIG. 3.
[84] As can be seen from FIG. 3, the formulation of Example 1 has exhibited better results in a reduction rate of somatic cells in milk, as compared to Lavac Staph of Comparative Example.
[85]
[86] Experimental Example 8: Comparison for yields of SECl mutant protein mi- croparticles between lyophilization and spray drying
[87] Microparticles of an SECl mutant protein were prepared by means of a lyophilization method having the most ideal drying temperature (eutectic point) conditions under which stability of the SECl mutant protein is maintained with formation of microparticles, and a spray drying method disclosed in Korean Patent No. 359252, respectively. Experimental conditions and the results thus obtained are given in TABLE 7.
[88] [TABLE 7] [89]
[90] As can be seen from TABLE 7, yield (%) of microparticles by the spray drying method was about 11%, while yield (%) of microparticles by the lyophilization method in accordance with the present invention was about 99%, thus representing a significant difference therebetween. That is, in producing the SECl mutant protein, it can be seen that preparation of SECl mutant protein microparticles via lyophilization is only suitable for mass production, thus making it possible to enter commercialization. Industrial Applicability
[91] As apparent from the above description, a formulation containing an SECl mutant protein in accordance with the present invention is capable of achieving effective in vivo delivery of a water-soluble mutant protein while maintaining activity thereof by inclusion of a protein-stabilizing excipient, a carbohydrate-based auxiliary excipient, a lipophilic material and a dispersion medium. In addition, the formulation in accordance with the present invention exhibits excellent effects on prevention and treatment of mastitis of dairy cows via an enhanced immunopotentiating effects due to superior antibody-producing ability when administered to dairy cows. Further, the formulation of the present invention can also be used as an injectable preparation due to excellent injectability.
[92] Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, additions and substitutions are possible, without departing from the scope
and spirit of the invention as disclosed in the accompanying claims.