Search Images Maps Play YouTube Gmail Drive Calendar More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20100320144 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/854,397
Publication date23 Dec 2010
Filing date11 Aug 2010
Priority date14 Apr 2004
Also published asUS7497947, US7625486, US7625489, US20060032123, US20090120871, US20090152185, US20100072129, US20110163027, US20120085700, US20120248037, US20130118976, US20130319934, US20140166573, US20160039696
Publication number12854397, 854397, US 2010/0320144 A1, US 2010/320144 A1, US 20100320144 A1, US 20100320144A1, US 2010320144 A1, US 2010320144A1, US-A1-20100320144, US-A1-2010320144, US2010/0320144A1, US2010/320144A1, US20100320144 A1, US20100320144A1, US2010320144 A1, US2010320144A1
InventorsDavid R. Knighton, Vance D. Fiegel
Original AssigneeEmbro Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Devices for water treatment
US 20100320144 A1
Abstract
A device for use in water comprising a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and a moss contained within the interior cavity in which the carrier completely encloses the moss.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
1. A method of treating water comprising contacting water with an amount of a non-decomposed moss effective to remove cations other than hydrogen ions from the water.
Description
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/625,876, filed Nov. 25, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/392,241, filed Feb. 25, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,625,486 B2, issued Dec. 1, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/106,049, filed Apr. 14, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,497,947 B2, issued Mar. 3, 2009, which claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/562,196, filed Apr. 14, 2004, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    This invention relates to devices for water treatment, and in particular relates to devices comprising sphagnum moss.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    There are many types of water treatment systems, such as filtration and cleaning systems for swimming pools and aquariums. Many of these systems filter the water to remove suspended matter and reduce the cloudy appearance of the water. Preventing bacterial growth in water and removing contaminants from water are significant industrial, as well as household, problems. For example, industrial effluent should be cleaned to remove toxic compounds as well as to remove bacteria before it is dumped into lakes and rivers. Containers of water such as swimming pools, hot tubs, aquariums and the like must be kept clean to prevent the water from becoming cloudy and/or the container walls from becoming slimy. The water may be treated by active means such as a filter to remove particles and bacteria, and it may also be treated by passive means whereby a biocide is placed in a container and floated in the water.
  • [0004]
    It is common to use chemical means to keep the water clean and reduce growth of bacteria and other microorganisms. Ultraviolet light, chlorination, bromination, treatment with ions of copper and silver as well as treatment with ozone can be used to treat and/or disinfect water. These are typical biocides, that is, substances or energies that destroy living organisms. Of course care must be taken with all these methods because of the possible toxicity or damage to the user. Chemicals require careful handling to avoid environmental contamination as well as contact with the user.
  • [0005]
    Sphagnum moss” is a generic expression that designates a range of botanical species that co-exist in a sphagnous bog. It should be noted that “peat moss” refers generally to a decomposed or composted sphagnum moss. Sphagnum moss is commonly harvested for use in various products. The petals, and not the stems, of the moss preferably may be harvested. Typically large pieces of plant material (roots, twigs, etc.) are removed and the moss may be processed further after harvesting by forming an aqueous slurry to extract very fine particles. Water is removed from the slurry and the moss is dried. The moss may be compressed prior to packaging or shipment. Various additives may be used to alter the absorption characteristics or mechanical properties of the moss. Because sphagnum moss is readily available and relatively inexpensive, it has been used in a variety of products, primarily for the absorption of fluids.
  • [0006]
    There is substantial need in the art for products that inhibit the growth of microorganisms such as bacteria, yeast, and algae. It would be desirable to have a means to maintain the clarity of water in a swimming pool, whirlpool bath, aquarium, and the like, for long periods of time, without shutting a system down for cleaning. The most desirable system would require very little maintenance and would be relatively inexpensive.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    The invention provides a device for use in water comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss.
  • [0008]
    The invention provides a method of inhibiting microorganism growth comprising placing in water susceptible to bacterial growth a device for inhibiting microorganism growth in water, the device comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss, and wherein the device comprises an amount of the moss effective to inhibit microorganism growth in the water.
  • [0009]
    The invention provides a kit comprising sterilized, non-decomposed moss and a device for use in water comprising a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity, wherein the interior cavity can completely enclose the moss.
  • [0010]
    The invention provides a method of inhibiting microorganism growth comprising placing in water susceptible to microorganism growth a device for inhibiting microorganism growth in water, the device comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss, wherein the device comprises an amount of the moss effective to inhibit microorganism growth in the water, and periodically shocking the water with an appropriate chemical agent.
  • [0011]
    The invention provides a method of treating water comprising placing in water a device comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss, and wherein the device comprises an amount of the moss effective to remove cations other than hydrogen ions from the water.
  • [0012]
    It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0013]
    FIG. 1A illustrates a perspective view of one embodiment of the device of this invention. FIG. 1B illustrates a side view, and FIG. 1C illustrates a cross-sectional view along line C-C of FIG. 1B.
  • [0014]
    FIG. 2A illustrates a perspective view of another embodiment of the device of this invention and FIG. 2B shows a side view of the moss used within the device shown in FIG. 2A.
  • [0015]
    FIG. 3 illustrates a perspective view of another embodiment of the device of this invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0016]
    We have discovered species of sphagnum moss that can be used to treat water such as in a swimming pool, spa, aquarium, whirlpool, and the like. It is believed that particular species of moss are particularly effective at inhibiting and/or preventing the growth of bacteria and other microorganisms.
  • [0017]
    In this invention, “bacteriostatic” refers to a material that inhibits the growth of bacteria. In common lexicography, the term “antibacterial” generally refers to a bacterial growth inhibitor. Both terms should be distinguished from “bactericidal” which refers to materials that kill bacteria upon contact.
  • [0018]
    In this invention, “water treatment” refers to a process by which water is kept clean, clear, and pleasant smelling in swimming pools, aquariums, spas, and the like. Spas are also known as whirlpools or hot tubs. When the water is agitated, less foaming is observed. The moss is believed to inhibit growth of bacteria and other microorganisms and it also may absorb compounds and substances that decrease water clarity.
  • [0019]
    In this invention, sphagnum papillosum (S. papillosum) and/or sphagnum cristatum (S. cristatum) can be used in water treatment devices. In preferred embodiments, the moss is enclosed or encapsulated in a mesh material that prevents the moss from disintegrating in an aqueous environment. Thus the moss can be held in a desired place in a pool, hot tub, whirlpool bath, and the like. Preferred mesh materials include those comprising polymers such as nylon or polypropylene, with mesh sizes ranging from about 0.1 to 1 mm. Polymers are generally preferred because they are inexpensive and may be resistant to degradation.
  • [0020]
    Suitable for use in this invention are S. papillosum, which can be harvested from bogs in northern Minnesota, U.S.A., and S. cristatum, which is commercially available as a compressed bale from Sutton's Moss of Dobson, Westland, New Zealand. These species of moss can be used by themselves or together in the devices and systems of this invention. Typically and preferably the moss is cleaned to remove small particles, such as dirt, and larger debris, such as roots and leaves. Commercially available moss may be fumigated before it is packaged by a manufacturer in order to destroy seeds.
  • [0021]
    In a preferred embodiment, the moss is cut by mechanical means into a desired size and shape. The moss preferably is then sterilized by autoclaving, exposure to ethylene oxide, or by other means known to one of skill in the art. Sterilization destroys living organisms in the moss and thus avoids any problems of undesirable or foreign bacteria being introduced into the environment where a device of this invention is used. The moss is then ready for use in a water treatment system or other applications.
  • [0022]
    We have found that a convenient, easy, effective, and inexpensive way of treating water is to place a portion of S. papillosum or S. cristatum in a floatation device that permits water to flow around and through the moss. Another way to use it is to encapsulate it in mesh and weight the mesh so that the moss will remain in the water. Any suitable means that will maintain contact of the moss with water is suitable for use. This device is then placed in the swimming pool, whirlpool, hot tub, etc., where it can come into contact with the water. We have found that treatment is remarkably effective in preventing growth of microorganisms and in keeping the water clean, clear and free of odor and foam. This is all the more remarkable because this is a passive system when compared to a filtration system which forces water through the moss. Of course it is to be understood that active filtration could be done with the device of this invention to treat the water.
  • [0023]
    When used in swimming pools, hot tubs, and the like, the water treatment devices described herein are preferably used in conjunction with materials that kill microorganisms. This is because these environments may have large loads of microorganisms, particularly bacteria, introduced at various times. Accordingly, standard practice is to filter the water, flush water lines, and test the water as necessary. The pH can be adjusted by using commercially available solutions. The water treatment devices of this invention are most desirably used in conjunction with an oxidizer, such as potassium monopersulfate, referred to as “chlorine free shock”. Potassium monopersulfate is known to increase the efficiency of chlorine purification products, but we have found that it is also particularly effective when used with the sphagnum moss devices described above.
  • [0024]
    The sphagnum moss of this invention can be used in any composition, material, device, or method where the inhibition of bacteria is desirable. Uses include the inhibition of microorganism growth, the reduction and/or prevention of odors, water treatment, and control of mold and fungal growth; and control of fermentation. Such devices and materials include absorbent products, such as diaper liners, feminine hygiene products, bandages, and wound dressings. In such products, the moss can be enclosed between membranes of differing liquid transmission characteristics. That is, for example, one membrane may be permeable to fluid and another membrane may be permeable to vapor. The moss can be incorporated into polymers and used as face masks. The moss can be encapsulated in membranes and used in food preservation products such as packaging wraps and liners to absorb liquid and odors. The moss can be used in water treatment products to keep water clean in storage tanks, aquariums, swimming pools, whirlpool baths, spas, and the like, as well as in water filtration devices. The moss can be used for waste water and sewage treatment. The moss can be shaped into, for example, discs or pellets, and used to absorb water from grain and other food products. The moss also can be used for fermentation control (such as in liquids or grains). The moss can be used for the control of fungal or bacterial diseases in lawns and gardens. The moss can be used for mold control products such as in storage containers or ductwork linings.
  • [0025]
    The invention provides a device for use in water comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss. The carrier can comprise a float. The carrier can comprise a float and a cylindrical portion beneath the float, the cylindrical portion having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity. The moss can be enclosed within a mesh bag. The carrier can comprise one or more weights.
  • [0026]
    The moss can be non-decomposed moss. The moss can be sphagnum moss. The moss can be selected from the group consisting of sphagnum papillosum, sphagnum cristatum, and mixtures thereof. The moss can be compressed and can be in the form of strips. The moss can be sterilized by autoclaving, sterilized by chemical treatment, or sterilized by treatment with ethylene oxide. The moss can be washed with an acidic solution, especially a solution of acetic acid. The moss can be washed with an acidic solution and then washed with a salt solution.
  • [0027]
    The invention provides a method of inhibiting microorganism growth comprising placing in water susceptible to microorganism growth a device for inhibiting microorganism growth in water, the device comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss, and wherein the device comprises an amount of the moss effective to inhibit microorganism growth in the water. The water can be in a spa, pool, or aquarium. The water can be pumped through the device.
  • [0028]
    The invention provides a kit comprising sterilized, non-decomposed moss and a device for use in water comprising a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity, wherein the interior cavity can completely enclose the moss. The kit can comprise one or more pH test strips and/or potassium monopersulfate.
  • [0029]
    The invention provides a method of inhibiting microorganism growth comprising placing in water susceptible to microorganism growth a device for inhibiting microorganism growth in water, the device comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss, wherein the device comprises an amount of the moss effective to inhibit microorganism growth in the water, and periodically shocking the water with an appropriate chemical agent. The chemical agent can be potassium monopersulfate.
  • [0030]
    The invention provides a method of treating water comprising placing in water a device comprising: (i) a carrier having an interior cavity and one or more openings allowing ingress to and egress from the interior cavity; and (ii) a moss contained within the interior cavity, wherein the carrier completely encloses the moss, and wherein the device comprises an amount of the moss effective to remove cations other than hydrogen ions from the water. The cations can be calcium or iron ions, and substantially all of the calcium or iron ions can be removed from the water. The moss can be compressed and can be in the form of strips. The moss can be sterilized by autoclaving, sterilized by chemical treatment, or sterilized by treatment with ethylene oxide. The moss can be washed with an acidic solution, especially a solution of acetic acid. The moss can be washed with an acidic solution and then washed with a salt solution. The water can be in a spa, pool, or aquarium.
  • [0031]
    FIGS. 1A to 1C illustrate a suitable device of this invention. FIG. 1A shows device 10 floating in water and FIGS. 1B and 1C shows side and cross sectional views, respectively. Device 10 is adapted to receive a segment of compressed sphagnum moss 15 that has been cut into a desired dimension. The moss is shown in phantom in FIGS. 1A and 1B. A convenient dimension for the moss used in device 10 is about 6×¼×¼ inches (15.2×0.63×0.63 cm). A piece of moss this size weighs about 5 grams. Moss 15 is enclosed in nylon mesh 16, sized to permit the compressed moss to expand. The mesh size is such that it will retain even small particles of moss and prevent it from breaking apart and floating away.
  • [0032]
    Device 10 comprises a plastic material that is impact resistant, does not dissolve in water, and can be shaped into a desired shape. Device 10 is commercially available as a “floater” from MP Industries of Huntington Beach, Calif. It should be noted that floaters of this type are commonly used with pellets or discs of pool cleaning agents, such as those containing chlorine. Device 10 has been adapted for use with sphagnum moss by adding holes to facilitate passage of water into the device.
  • [0033]
    Device 10 comprises float portion 20 and flow through portion 30. Float portion 20 is cylindrical, and may be any desired dimension, though typically it is larger in diameter than flow-through portion 30. A useful dimension for the float portion is about 5 inches (12.7 cm) in diameter.
  • [0034]
    Flow-through portion 30 is a two-part elongated cylinder having core or hollow center 32. First part 33 is attached to floatation portion 20 and is provided with screw threads onto which second part 35 affixes. In this way the length of the flow-through portion can be changed. Second part 35 is fixed in position by means of adjustable collar 34. Second part 35 also has removable cap 37, which is weighted so that device 10 floats in the water as illustrated in FIG. 1.
  • [0035]
    Slots 38 and holes 39 permit water to flow through the cylinder. The slots and holes may be any desired dimension and can be positioned as desired. A useful length of the flow through portion is about 7 inches (17.8 cm). Cap 37 is removable so that the desired size of the sphagnum moss can be inserted into portion 30. Once exposed to water, the compressed moss expands. The density of expanded moss is such that water can permeate it. Device 10 is sufficient to treat up to about 500 gallons of water (for example, in a whirlpool or spa) for up to 30 days.
  • [0036]
    FIG. 2A illustrates device 50 floating in water. Device 50 comprises cylindrical portion 60 having core or hollow center 62. Slots 64 and holes 66 permit water to enter the hollow center. Moss 55, shown in phantom in FIG. 2A, is encapsulated by mesh 52, as most clearly shown in FIG. 2B. The moss expands when in contact with the water, filling hollow center 62. Cylindrical portion 60 is shown sealed at one end, with removable cap 57 at the other end. Cap 57 may be weighted so that the maximum length of device 60 stays in contact with the water.
  • [0037]
    FIG. 3 shows device 70 attached to wall W of a swimming pool, aquarium, hot tub, or the like. Moss 75 is encapsulated by mesh 72 and the mesh is affixed to bracket 77. The mesh is of a sufficient size that particles or fragments of moss will stay within the mesh. The bracket hangs from the wall and the device can remain fixed at this location. Alternatively, device 70 could lie on the bottom of the pool or tub. It could be affixed there or could be held down by a weight. It could also be placed in-line with a filter.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • [0038]
    S. papillosum moss, harvested from northern Minnesota, and was prepared for bacterial inhibition testing. The moss species was validated by the University of Minnesota and again upon receipt.
  • [0039]
    All samples were placed in plastic bags. All raw moss was stored at 4° C. until processed by lab personnel. All pre-dried outside moss samples were stored at room temperature until processed.
  • [0040]
    The following equipment was used:
  • [0000]
    a) Blender, 1.25 L capacity (commercially available as Osterizer® from Oster)
    b) Distilled Water (available from Premium Water, Inc.)
    c) Tissue Sieve, 1 cup capacity (commercially available as Cellector® E-C Apparatus Corp.)
    d) 1 L Glass Beaker (commercially available as Pyrex®)
    e) Sterile Polystyrene Petri Dishes 100×15 mm (commercially available from Falcon)
    f) Sterile Polystyrene Petri Dishes 150×15 mm (commercially available from VWR)
    g) Autoclave (commercially available from Market Forge)
    h) Metal Lab Scoop (16.5 cm)/commercially available as Adison Tissue
    Forceps from VWR)
    i) Laminar Flow Hood (commercially available from Baker)
  • Procedure:
  • [0041]
    1) Raw moss was taken out of the bag by hand and picked clean of any visible, roots, leafs and debris and placed in the blender. The blender was then filled with moss until it reached approximately the 1 L mark.
    2) The blender was then filled with 1 L of distilled water and shaken manually with the lid on for 30 seconds and drained to remove any remaining dirt and debris. The process was repeated 2 more times to thoroughly wash the moss.
    3) The blender was then filled with distilled water again and the moss was blended using the pulse mode on settings 4 and 5 for 30 seconds each until the moss was homogeneous throughout the sample.
    4) The blender was then drained of water. Any remaining water was then squeezed out by hand from the moss using the tissue sieve. The squeezed moss was then placed in a clean 1 L beaker. Steps 1 to 4 were repeated until the 1 L beaker was filled with processed moss. The beaker was then autoclaved for 20 minutes at 121° C. at 15 psi (103.4 MPa) using the liquid setting and allowed to cool at room temperature.
    5) Once cooled, the moss was brought to the laminar flow hood and carefully placed in labeled, pre-weighed Petri dishes using a sterile lab scoop and forceps. Special care was taken not contaminate the moss and to pack each dish in a uniform manner. Once packed, the dishes remain uncovered for at least 72 hours until the moss was dry. The dried dishes were covered and kept in the flow hood until used.
  • Example 2
  • [0042]
    S. cristatum moss, obtained from Sutton's Moss, Canada, (harvested in New Zealand) was prepared for bacterial inhibition testing. The moss species was validated upon receipt. Handling of the moss samples was identical to that described above in Example 1.
  • [0043]
    The following equipment was used:
  • [0000]
    a) Sterile syringes, individually wrapped 30 cc or 60 cc (commercially available from Becton Dickenson)
    b) Sterile syringe filters, 0.45 μm (micrometer) and 0.20 μm (commercially available as Acrodisc from Pall Gellman)
    c) Adison tissue forceps (commercially available from VWR)
    d) 50 cc polypropylene graduated test tubes, sterile pack (commercially available from Falcon)
    e) Wax film (Parafilm®, commercially available from American National Can)
    f) Laminar flow hood (commercially available from Baker Company)
    g) Pipetman with sterile graduated polypropylene tips, 25 mL (commercially available from Becton Dickenson)
  • h) 10 M HCl and 10 M NaOH
  • [0044]
    i) pH Meter (commercially available from Beckman Omega 40)
  • Reagents and Solutions Preparations: (Depending on Liquid Used for Treatment) a) Bacto™ Tryptic Soy Broth, 30 g/L (Becton Dickenson)/MEM-Alpha (Gibco)
  • [0045]
    b) Phosphate Buffered Saline (1×), pH 7.1 (commercially available from Gibco™)
    c) HPLC Grade Water (commercially available from J. T. Baker)
  • Procedure
  • [0046]
    a) All liquids used for treatment were either autoclaved or filter sterilized and stored at a proper temperature prior to use in this protocol. All treatment steps were done with in the laminar flow hood using aseptic technique. Tissue forceps used were autoclaved prior to use.
    b) After weighing the dried moss, the treatment liquid was pipetted into the Petri dish at a concentration of one milliliter of treatment liquid to every 50 mg dried moss. If a concentration other that 50 mg/mL was used, the process changed accordingly.
    c) The Petri dish of moss was wrapped in wax film (Parafilm®) and refrigerated at 4° C. for one hour.
    d) The Petri dish was removed from the refrigerator and the moss was scooped and packed into a 30 cc or 60 cc syringe using sterile tissue forceps. The plunger of the syringe was re-inserted and the liquid was squeezed into a sterile 50 mL polypropylene test tube until all possible liquid was extracted.
    e) The treatment liquid was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter, then a 0.2 μm syringe filter and stored at 4° C. until used.
    f) Filtered samples were pH adjusted using 1.0 M HCl/NaOH and sterile filtered with a 0.2 μm syringe filter and stored again at 4° C. until used in the bacteria inhibition assay.
  • Example 3
  • [0047]
    This experiment determined the amount of bacterial growth in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) by an inhibition assay.
  • [0048]
    All S. papillosum and S. cristatum moss treatment samples used in this assay were prepared as described above. TSB was also prepared, autoclaved and stored at 4° C. prior to use.
  • [0049]
    The following equipment was used:
  • a) Beckman® DU-64 Spectrophotometer
  • [0050]
    b) Incubator Oven (commercially available from Boekel Instruments Model #133000)
    c) 5 mL and 50 mL Polystyrene Tubes (commercially available from Falcon)
    d) 10 μL and 1 mL polypropylene tips (commercially available from Pipetman)
  • Reagents and Solutions:
  • [0051]
    a) Bacto® Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), 30 g/L (commercially available from Becton Dickenson)
    b) Escherichia Coli frozen culture stock grown in TSB for a minimum of 3 log growth phases (Clinical isolate)
    c) Staphylococcus Aureus frozen culture stock grown in TSB for a minimum of 3 log growth phases. (ATCC Strain #29213 (American Type Culture Collection of Manassas, Va.))
    d) Distilled Water (commercially available from Premium Water Inc.)
    e) TSB treatment sample of S. papillosum moss and New Zealand moss
  • Procedure:
  • [0052]
    1) TSB nutrient broth was prepared by adding 30 g/L Bacto® Tryptic Soy Broth to distilled water. The solution was stirred with a stir-bar until all the powder was dissolved and autoclaved at 121° C. for 20 minutes. The S. papillosum sample was prepared as described in B, above. One mL of the solutions, TSB or moss-treated TSB sample, was pipetted into 3 to 5 mL polystyrene test tubes.
    2) Frozen aliquots of E. coli and S. aureus stored at −20° C. were allowed to thaw to room temperature. Once thawed, 100 μL of each bacterial stock was added to a 10 mL aliquot of TSB. Each tube was then capped, thoroughly mixed, labeled and placed in the incubator at 37° C.
    3) Ten μL of bacteria stock was pipetted into the one mL solutions and the tubes were incubated at 37° C. for the desired time. One tube in each sample and time point did not receive bacteria in order to serve as the blank.
    4) The solutions were removed from the 37° C. oven at the assigned time points and placed in an ice bath. Samples were then immediately read on the spectrophotometer at 550 nm. The absolute OD value was sample minus the blank. Inhibition was measured as percent decrease in OD value vs. the appropriate TSB control sample.
  • Example 4
  • [0053]
    The following data illustrate the effect of treatment of bacterial growth media (i.e., Tryptic Soy Broth) with various moss species according to the procedure in Example 3. Non-sphagnum species are very poor at preventing E. coli growth. Of the moss tested below, the most effective sphagnum mosses to prevent E. coli growth were S. papillosum and S. cristatum. “N” refers to the number of tests, “Range” presents the highest and lowest numbers obtained for these tests; and “Mean” refers to the mean value of the tests.
  • [0000]
    % Inhibition of
    Bacterial Growth
    Mean N Range
    Sphagnum Species
    S. papillosum (MN) 48 10 26-71
    S. cristatum (NZ - Sutton Moss) 45 8 31-62
    S. magellanicum (WI - Mosser Lee) 34 7 21-43
    S. fuscum (MN) 20 1
    S. falcatulum (NZ) 7 2  2-11
    Non-Sphagnum Species
    Sheet Moss (WI - Mosser Lee) 4 1
    Spanish Moss (WI - Mosser Lee) −2 1
  • Example 5
  • [0054]
    TSB was treated with S. papillosum and the ability of this solution to support bacterial growth was measured according to Example 3. The percent inhibition of bacterial growth for E. coli (clinical isolate) and S. aureus (ATCC Strain # 29213) is reported. A TSB Control sample and moss-treated TSB solutions (MT-TSB) are reported below. The OD of a blank (B) is subtracted from the measured OD (Meas.) of the sample to obtain the reported Value.
  • [0000]
    E. coli S. aureus
    Test Material B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.063 0.744 0.681 0.063 0.250 0.187
    (Control) 0.726 0.663 0.257 0.194
    Mean 0.672 0.191
    SD 0.013 0.005
    MT-TSB 0.109 0.662 0.553 0.109 0.279 0.170
    (5 mg/mL) 0.714 0.605 0.285 0.176
    Mean 0.579 0.173
    SD 0.037 0.004
    % Inhibition 13.84 9.19
    MT-TSB 0.131 0.575 0.444 0.131 0.278 0.147
    (10 mg/mL) 0.748 0.617 0.274 0.143
    Mean 0.531 0.145
    SD 0.122 0.003
    % Inhibition 21.06 23.88
    MT-TSB 0.173 0.662 0.489 0.173 0.276 0.101
    (25 mg/mL) 0.652 0.479 0.284 0.111
    Mean 0.484 0.107
    SD 0.007 0.006
    % Inhibition 27.98 43.83
    MT-TSB 0.243 0.599 0.356 0.243 0.355 0.112
    (50 mg/mL) 0.564 0.321 0.352 0.109
    Mean 0.339 0.111
    SD 0.025 0.002
    % Inhibition 49.63 41.99
    MT-TSB 0.284 0.388 0.104 0.284 0.361 0.077
    (75 mg/Ml) 0.430 0.146 0.355 0.071
    Mean 0.125 0.074
    SD 0.030 0.004
    % Inhibition 81.40 61.15
    MT-TSB 0.274 0.322 0.048 0.274 0.322 0.048
    (100 mg/mL) 0.339 0.065 0.310 0.036
    Mean 0.057 0.042
    SD 0.012 0.008
    % Inhibition 91.59 77.95
  • Example 6
  • [0055]
    This example demonstrates that treatment with moss does not kill the bacteria but it does inhibit their growth. A fluorescence assay, commercially available from Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg., Kit No. L-7012, was used to determine the viability of bacteria. This system uses mixtures of green and red fluorescent nucleic acid stains that have differing ability to penetrate viable and non-viable bacterial cells. The green fluorescent strain, which emits at 500 nm, binds to both viable and non-viable bacteria. The red fluorescent strain, which emits at 650 nm, binds only to non-viable bacteria. Therefore, a bacterial sample containing a higher proportion of non-viable bacteria will have an altered staining ratio. The data show that for both E. coli and S. aureus, the ratio of viable to non-viable bacteria remains the same as in the control sample.
  • Procedure:
  • [0056]
    1. 100 μL was incubated in 10 mL of media (pH controlled TSB and S. papillosum sample, as prepared in Examples 1 and 2, respectively) for 3 hours at 37° C.
    2. This mixture was centrifuged to concentrate the bacteria, which was then resuspended in 10 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
    3. Three mL of resuspended bacteria were added to each of three cuvettes.
    4. 40 μL Styo-9 dye was mixed with 40 μL Propidium Iodide dye. Caution should be used as these compounds are believed to be carcinogens.
    5. 9 μL of the mixed dye solution was added to each cuvette and stored in the dark for 15 minutes.
    6. Two PBS cuvettes were prepared with no dye and two PBS cuvettes were prepared with dye to be used as blanks.
    7. The solutions were mixed thoroughly. The fluorescence intensity is measured at 500 nm (with absorption at 480 nm) and at 650 nm (with absorption at 490 nm). The ratio of these two values relates to the degree of viability of the bacterial culture.
    The following tables report the fluorescence intensity at two wavelengths for bacterial samples in two different media. The intensity of fluorescence at 500 nm over the intensity of the fluorescence at 650 nm creates a ratio which relates to the degree of viability of the bacterial culture. The mean of three TSB and three moss-treated TSB samples (MT-TSB) is reported below. In each case, the percent of inhibition is compared to a control sample.
  • [0000]
    Viability Assay for E. coli (clinical isolate)
    Media 500 nm 650 nm Ratio 500/650
    TSB 505.117 5.783 87.3228
    MT-TSB of 130.1833 1.5167 85.8352
    S. papillosum
  • [0000]
    Viability Assay for S. aureus (ATCC Strain #29213)
    Media 500 nm 650 nm Ratio 500/650
    TSB 80.117 3.533 22.6745
    MT-TSB of 45.055 2.0667 21.7984
    S. papillosum

    The data show that there is no significant change in the ratios between TSB and the moss-treated TSB, indicating that the effect of the moss is bacteriostatic rather than bactericidal.
  • Example 7
  • [0057]
    Various bacteria were treated with S. papillosum TSB (concentration of 50 mg/mL) according to Example 3. The percent inhibition of bacterial growth is reported. Both a TSB Control sample and moss-treated TSB solutions (MT-TSB) are reported below. The “Value” is obtained by subtracting the optical density (OD) of a blank (B) from the measured OD (Meas.) of a sample.
  • [0058]
    Two studies were done and are denoted (1) and (2) below.
  • [0000]
    S. aureus
    E. coli ATCC #
    (clinical isolate) 29213
    Test Material (1) B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.034 0.694 0.660 0.034 0.273 0.239
    (Control) 0.718 0.684 0.257 0.253
    Mean 0.672 0.246
    SD 0.017 0.010
    MT-TSB 0.219 0.542 0.323 0.219 0.362 0.143
    0.572 0.353 0376 0.157
    Mean 0.338 0.150
    SD 0.021 0.010
    % Inhibition 49.7 39.02
  • [0000]
    E. coli S. aureus
    Test Material (2) B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.043 0.693 0.650 0.043 0.332 0.289
    (Control) 0.667 0.624 0.327 0.284
    Mean 0.637 0.287
    SD 0.018 0.004
    MT-TSB 0.247 0.492 0.245 0.247 0.394 0.147
    0.498 0.251 0.428 0.181
    Mean 0.248 0.164
    SD 0.004 0.024
    % Inhibition 61.07 42.76
  • [0000]
    S. epidermidis P. aeruginosa
    ATTC # 12228 ATTC #10145
    Test Material (1) B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.034 0.388 0.354 0.034 0.175 0.141
    (Control) 0.412 0.375 0.167 0.133
    Mean 0.366 0.137
    SD 0.017 0.006
    MT-TSB 0.219 0.542 0.323 0.219 0.321 0.102
    0.572 0.353 0.331 0.112
    Mean 0.338 0.107
    SD 0.021 0.007
    % Inhibition 53.26 21.90
  • [0000]
    S. epidermidis P. aeruginosa
    Test Material (2) B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.043 0.349 0.306 0.043 0.204 0.161
    (Control) 0.327 0.284 0.186 0.143
    Mean 0.295 0.152
    SD 0.016 0.013
    MT-TSB 0.247 0.428 0.181 0.247 0.371 0.124
    0.444 0.197 0.340 0.093
    Mean 0.189 0.109
    SD 0.011 0.022
    % Inhibition 35.93 28.62
  • [0000]
    C. albicans A. amsterodami
    ATTC # 10231 ATTC # 1001
    Test Material (1) B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.034 0.068 0.034 0.034 0.053 0.019
    (Control) 0.069 0.035 0.047 0.013
    Mean 0.035 0.016
    SD 0.001 0.004
    MT-TSB 0.219 0.249 0.030 0.219 0.231 0.012
    0.245 0.026 0.229 0.010
    Mean 0.028 0.011
    SD 0.003 0.001
    % Inhibition 18.84 31.25
  • [0000]
    C. albicans A. amsterodami
    Test Material (2) B Meas. Value B Meas. Value
    TSB 0.043 0.1019 0.058 0.043 0.067 0.024
    (Control) 0.057 0.044 0.071 0.028
    Mean 0.051 0.026
    SD 0.010 0.003
    MT-TSB 0.247 0.275 0.028 0.247 0.268 0.021
    0.292 0.045 0.254 0.007
    Mean 0.037 0.014
    SD 0.012 0.010
    % Inhibition 28.43 46.15
  • Example 8 Effect of Acid Treatment of the Moss
  • [0059]
    Compressed sticks of S. cristatum moss (obtained from Sutton's Moss, Canada (harvested in New Zealand)) were soaked in four increasing concentrations of Fe (Fe standard in concentrated HCl, 0, 0.5, 5, 50 mg/L, available from Ricca Chemicals, Arlington, Tex.) at 50 mg moss/ml in distilled water. The soaked moss was stored overnight at 4 C. The Fe solutions were extracted by syringe, filtered and measured for Fe by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry analysis. The results showed that the moss bound significant amounts of Fe, up to 15 mg/L in the 50 mg/L sample. This experiment was run with distilled water washed moss resulting in similar results. However, it was noted that the Fe spiked samples had a low pH. Since optimal binding is at pH 4 to 6, we adjusted the pH up to between 4 and 7 on the next experiment. When the pH of the Fe samples was brought up, the Fe started to precipitate. The moss removed all of the Fe from the sample (up to 25 mg/L). It was then decided that ions bound to the moss before use could affect the cation binding tests and methods to remove the cations from the moss should be investigated.
  • [0060]
    When developing the method for acid washing Sphagnum moss (not peat moss, which is decomposed moss), two different acids were first used. One batch of moss (approx. 5 g) was constantly stirred in 3.5 L of distilled water pH adjusted to 1 with concentrated HNO3. For the other batch of moss, a 2% solution of glacial acetic acid was used. The washes were stirred for 1 hour, then the supernatant was filtered off and new wash solution was put on the moss. This was repeated for a total of four acid washes. The acid washes were followed by 4 distilled water washes carried out the same way. At the end of the distilled water washes, the conductivity was similar to that of distilled water. The two acids removed similar amounts of ions; therefore acetic acid was routinely used for washing the moss thereafter.
  • [0061]
    It was decided that a metal that was soluble at neutral pH would be better suited to test binding capacity and test for improvement of binding with acid washed Sphagnum moss vs. non-washed moss. Calcium was chosen for this purpose. The moss used was the S. cristatum moss described earlier in this example, the acid used was a 2% solution of glacial acetic acid, and the wash was performed as described in the preceding paragraph. The first test showed the opposite of what was expected, the non-washed moss bound the most and the acid washed moss bound the least. When the pH of the samples was checked, it was discovered that the binding ability correlated with pH. The acid washed moss reduced the pH of the solutions, which affected the ion binding. To eliminate this problem, acid washed moss was washed with a high salt solution to displace the H+ ions with Na. The high salt solution was 1M sodium acetate and approximately 5 g of moss was constantly stirred in 3.5 L of this sodium acetate solution for one hour, and then the wash was repeated. These two sodium acetate washes were followed by four washes with distilled water, each wash for one hour, and each was carried out the same way. The acid/salt-washed moss was tested; the pH of the extract did not drop and showed a significant improvement of binding over distilled water and non-washed moss as can be seen in the following table (concentrations of Ca are in ppm).
  • [0000]
    Starting Resulting
    Moss treatment [Ca] Average [Ca] Stdev pH
    Control 0 −1.08 0.61 6.02
    Acetic Acid, Acetate 0 −0.97 0.45 7.62
    Washed
    No wash 0 −0.14 0.51 5.26
    Distilled water washed 0 0.36 1.32 5.13
    Acetic Acid, Acetate 100 −1.40 0.25 6.62
    washed
    No wash 100 11.24 0.00 4.81
    Distilled water washed 100 16.89 1.17 4.54
    Control 100 88.76 0.05 6.65
    Acetic Acid, Acetate 200 −0.33 0.87 6.17
    washed
    No wash 200 46.47 5.88 4.82
    Distilled water washed 200 53.55 4.42 4.61
    Control 200 198.10 1.83 6.76

    The pH of the extracts varied by up to 2 pH units, so it was still difficult to distinguish between the effects of acid washing and pH. Therefore a new method to test for binding of the moss was developed that would allow adjustment of pH while the moss was still in the sample solutions. This was accomplished by using multi-well plates, small stir bars and 10 mg/ml moss concentrations. After the solutions were on the moss for approximately one-half hour, the pH's of the solutions were all adjusted to within 0.25 pH units of 6.5. This allowed for the testing of acid/salt washed moss and acid only washed moss. The results are shown below. The averages shown are the averages of two samples.
  • [0000]
    Starting Resulting
    Moss treatment [Ca] Average [Ca] Stdev
    Acetic Acid/Na acetate 0.00 6.93 0.72
    washed
    Acetic Acid washed 0.00 6.16 0.16
    Distilled water washed 0.00 6.85 0.31
    No wash 0.00 8.54 1.56
    Control 0.00 8.10 0.31
    Acetic Acid/Na acetate 100.00 6.78 0.31
    washed
    Acetic Acid washed 100.00 6.82 0.26
    Distilled water washed 100.00 20.73 1.09
    No wash 100.00 26.25 0.72
    Control 100.00 92.27 1.56
    Acetic Acid/Na acetate 500.00 307.28 7.25
    washed
    Acetic Acid washed 500.00 319.25 8.13
    Distilled water washed 500.00 375.18 3.36
    No wash 500.00 382.85 4.38
    Control 500.00 454.30 8.91

    With the pH's adjusted to be within 0.5 pH units of each other; the pH effect is eliminated and the significantly improved binding capacity of the acid washed mosses can be seen. The acid/salt washed moss bound slightly better than the acid only washed moss and the distilled washed slightly better than the non-washed moss, but barely enough to be significant.
  • [0062]
    Thus, the moss was shown to bind both Fe and Ca ions, and therefore is effective in water treatment because the removal of one or both of these ions is a goal of water treatment.
  • [0063]
    The above description and the drawings are provided for the purpose of describing embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US221909 *10 Mar 187925 Nov 1879F OneImprovement in medical compounds
US239564 *22 Dec 188029 Mar 1881 Remedy for coughs and colds
US413621 *29 Aug 188922 Oct 1889 Hoof-packing
US1914824 *6 May 192920 Jun 1933Rudolf EberhardProcess for the preparation of humous colloids
US2605589 *14 Nov 19505 Aug 1952Kuestner Alfred E ESod unit
US2785106 *16 Aug 195212 Mar 1957Ions Exchange And Chemical CorProcess for making antiseptic article
US2876588 *9 Aug 195610 Mar 1959Live Grass Pack CompanyMethod of producing a live grass package
US3635816 *12 Aug 196918 Jan 1972Golub GeraldMethod of purifying citrus plant effluent and raising worms and fish
US3835042 *26 Sep 197310 Sep 1974Univ Sherbrooke SherbrookeRemoval and recovery of chromium from polluted waters
US3890910 *19 Apr 197324 Jun 1975Bunzl & Biach AgMethod of laying webs of composite material containing plant seed
US3894355 *28 Jan 197415 Jul 1975Charles H CarothersMethod and means for automatic field growing of crops using solid and liquid waste
US3903267 *1 Jul 19702 Sep 1975Inst Przemyslu MiesnegoAromatizing and/or antiseptic and/or oxidation inhibiting agent as well as method of producing and applying the agent
US3914901 *25 Nov 197428 Oct 1975Muldner Lawrence CarlMat for growing lawns or other vegetation and process for producing same
US3961444 *15 May 19758 Jun 1976Springtime Flowers, Inc.Flower pot container for plant seeds in a dormant growing medium and method of preparing for storage and shipment and then using same
US4002566 *7 Apr 197511 Jan 1977Smith John DWater purifying systems
US4014676 *17 Dec 197329 Mar 1977Imperial Chemical Industries LimitedWater treatment for controlling the growth of algae employing biguanides
US4079543 *1 Apr 197721 Mar 1978Stoller Benjamin BSynthetic casings for mushroom beds
US4123359 *22 Dec 197631 Oct 1978Smith John DWater purifying system and pump therefor
US4146646 *27 Jan 197727 Mar 1979Fisons LimitedBis-amide fungicidal compounds
US4190981 *23 Aug 19784 Mar 1980Muldner Lawrence CarlMat for growing lawns or other vegetation
US4215692 *30 Jan 19795 Aug 1980Johnson & JohnsonAbsorbent structure
US4272527 *26 Feb 19799 Jun 1981Belkevich Peter IMedicinal preparation containing the extract of peat wax resin
US4272962 *13 Dec 197816 Jun 1981Westinghouse Electric Corp.Pressure controller for dual purpose steam turbine power plant
US4402941 *15 Sep 19816 Sep 1983Marc VaillancourtVeterinary composition for preventing feline urological syndrome and litter product containing the composition
US4528774 *16 Jul 198216 Jul 1985Vivian A. SkaifePlant and seed growing system
US4537590 *20 Jun 198327 Aug 1985Personal Products CompanySuperthin absorbent product
US4551165 *18 Apr 19835 Nov 1985National Research Development CorporationMycorrhizal seed pellets
US4560372 *1 May 198424 Dec 1985Personal Products CompanyStable disposable absorbent structure
US4588400 *16 Dec 198213 May 1986Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.Liquid loaded pad for medical applications
US4588693 *28 Feb 198313 May 1986Research And Development Institute, Inc. At Montana State UniversityDevelopment of plant roots
US4618496 *16 Jul 198421 Oct 1986Johnson & JohnsonAntimicrobial peat moss composition
US4624790 *19 Nov 198125 Nov 1986Lancy International, Inc.Reduction of metal content of treated effluents
US4676196 *20 Jun 198530 Jun 1987Martin Feed Mills Ltd.Absorbent material
US4704818 *5 Feb 198610 Nov 1987Cameron Murray CHydroponic growing system and stackable modular components thereof
US4788146 *9 Jan 198629 Nov 1988Johnson & Johnson Patient Care, Inc.Liquid loaded pad for medical applications
US4798723 *5 Oct 198717 Jan 1989Lubrizol Genetics, Inc.Agricultural products from Pseudomonas cepacia strains and methods of preparation
US4827871 *22 Dec 19879 May 1989Morrison David GProcessed peat poultry litter for confined enclosures
US4861481 *1 Aug 198829 Aug 1989Allen Iii Ralph SMulti-functional filtering medium
US4936910 *18 Aug 198926 Jun 1990Great Lakes Chemical CorporationProcess for the recovery of gold
US4941282 *29 Dec 198717 Jul 1990Gene MilsteinWildflower sod mat and method of propagation
US4971702 *22 Aug 198920 Nov 1990Western Research InstituteSelenium adsorption process
US4999202 *10 Feb 198912 Mar 1991National Energy CouncilComposition having bacteriocidal or bacteriostatic acitivity
US5049002 *28 Jun 199017 Sep 1991Cole Pamela RMethod for cleaning oil spills
US5049265 *12 Feb 199017 Sep 1991Bord Na MonaEffluent treatment system
US5060598 *17 Apr 199029 Oct 1991Richards Jeffrey CCat litter
US5108614 *10 May 198928 Apr 1992Serrener Consultation Inc.Device and a method for filtering a liquid with wood ash to remove impurities therefrom
US5118504 *19 Jun 19912 Jun 1992Givaudan Roure (International) SaHypoallergenic moss oils and methods for preparing same
US5178769 *12 Dec 199012 Jan 1993Hydrocarbon Filtration Systems Inc.Filter for removing liquid hydrocarbons from water and process of removing gaseous and/or hydrocarbons from water
US5181802 *23 Oct 198926 Jan 1993Norvald ThengsOil collector
US5187200 *18 Dec 199116 Feb 1993Rainer Norman BProcess for the selective absorption of anions
US5242582 *7 Nov 19917 Sep 1993Askoll S.P.A.Aquarium filter
US5271987 *10 Jan 199221 Dec 1993Weyerhaeuser CompanyUnitary absorbent structure
US5290554 *16 Mar 19921 Mar 1994Torf EstablishmentProcess for the extraction of peat and apparatus for carrying out the process
US5296293 *23 Dec 199122 Mar 1994E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyParticulate material suitable for the removal of heavy metals
US5346514 *30 Jun 199313 Sep 1994Molnar Charles IVersatile plant sod mat and method for propagation
US5360117 *23 Aug 19931 Nov 1994Torf EstablishmentProcess for the extraction of peat and apparatus for carrying out the process
US5360608 *3 Feb 19931 Nov 1994Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.Fungicidal compositions comprising chitinase and enterobacter cloacae, and a method for stimulation proliferation of E. Cloacase
US5373025 *14 Jun 199313 Dec 1994Olin CorporationSanitizer for swimming pools, spas, and hot tubs
US5378460 *15 Mar 19943 Jan 1995Research Corporation TechnologiesNematocidal Bacillus thuringiensis biopesticide
US5389257 *7 Nov 199114 Feb 1995Ecological Engineering AssociatesMethod for treating water
US5403584 *30 Jun 19934 Apr 1995Idaho Research Foundation, Inc.Use of Streptomyces WYEC 108 to control plant pathogens
US5418165 *19 Apr 199323 May 1995The University Of Alaska-FairbanksCold tolerant trichoderma
US5454191 *11 Mar 19943 Oct 1995Mayeda; TedFlexible pouch-like hanging basket liner
US5476523 *23 Sep 199319 Dec 1995The Hiraoka Environmental Science LaboratoryMoss seedling and method of producing dense moss mat therefrom
US5476591 *5 May 199419 Dec 1995Harrison Western Environmental Services, Inc.Liquid treatment system and method for operating the same
US5478463 *28 Jul 199426 Dec 1995Exxon Chemical Patents Inc.Method of reducing sludge and varnish precursors in lubricating oils
US5527526 *31 Mar 199518 Jun 1996Idaho Research Foundation, Inc.Use of streptomyces bacteria to control plant pathogens
US5533300 *30 Dec 19939 Jul 1996Haimbaugh Enterprises, Inc.Plant feeder and method for feeding plant roots
US5543300 *28 Sep 19926 Aug 1996Torf EstablishmentMethod and composition for determining the immunological activity of bioactive substances
US5549889 *5 Mar 199327 Aug 1996Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.Nematocidal and fungicidal Streptomyces dicklowii biopesticide
US5580192 *24 May 19953 Dec 1996Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.Artificial soil structure and a method of preventing land desertification using the same
US5584140 *23 Jan 199617 Dec 1996Byrne; MichaelRooting method for vegetative plant propagation of hard-to-root plants
US5597489 *2 Mar 199528 Jan 1997Sepragen CorporationMethod for removing contaminants from water
US5602071 *17 May 199511 Feb 1997Aero-Terra-Aqua Technologies CorporationBead for removing dissolved metal contaminants
US5608989 *6 Apr 199511 Mar 1997Behrens; WolfgangPlant growth system for the enhancement of the environment
US5635029 *20 Jul 19953 Jun 1997Johnson & Johnson Inc.Method for manufacturing an absorbent structure using sphagnum moss material
US5688259 *6 Feb 199618 Nov 1997The Procter & Gamble CompanyAbsorbent article having resilient center
US5690827 *19 Oct 199525 Nov 1997Simmering; Stephen G.Sewage treatment system using peat and a constructed wetland
US5693220 *15 Apr 19962 Dec 1997Sceusa; Nicholas A.Aquarium filtration system for semi-aquatic animals
US5704989 *27 Nov 19956 Jan 1998Pro Earth, L.L.C.Closed loop surface cleaning system
US5707527 *30 Apr 199613 Jan 1998Stormwater Treatment LlcApparatus and method for treating storm water runoff
US5718697 *14 Dec 199517 Feb 1998Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Liquid absorbent sphagnum moss article and method for manufacturing the absorbent article
US5747050 *11 Mar 19925 May 1998Torf EstablishmentPeat-derived bioactive products, pharmaceutical and cosmetic compositions containing said products and processes for producing said products and compositions
US5759225 *10 Jul 19962 Jun 1998Tetsuya TanoshimaCulture soil, process for producing the same, and seedling-growing peat board
US5797894 *11 Oct 199425 Aug 1998Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Unitized sanitary napkin
US5807484 *23 Oct 199615 Sep 1998Couture; RealWaste water treatment
US5814233 *10 Nov 199729 Sep 1998Great Lakes Chemical CorporationCompositions and methods for treating water
US5829193 *30 May 19973 Nov 1998Combi CorporationMoquette for a horticultural hanging pot
US5843415 *16 May 19971 Dec 1998Townley Jewelry, Inc.Scented hair gel having particulate matter in the form of glitter with predetermined shapes
US5853460 *21 Feb 199729 Dec 1998Alcordo; Isabelo S.Air purifier using plant root interaction
US5853706 *19 Mar 199729 Dec 1998Townley Jewelry, Inc.Scented hair gel having particulate matter in the form of glitter
US5895380 *19 Feb 199720 Apr 1999Mcneil-Ppc, Inc.Absorbent products
US5934011 *5 Jun 199810 Aug 1999Showa Denko K. K.Seedling culture mat
US5942478 *4 Sep 199724 Aug 1999Lopes; John A.Microbicidal and sanitizing soap compositions
US5945446 *10 Feb 199731 Aug 1999Laubc Biochemicals, CorporationProcess for preparing synthetic soil-extract materials and medicaments based thereon
US5980748 *6 Mar 19979 Nov 1999Texel Inc.Method for the treatment of a liquid
US5997812 *1 Aug 19967 Dec 1999Coolant Treatment Systems, L.L.C.Methods and apparatus for the application of combined fields to disinfect fluids
US6012251 *30 Aug 199511 Jan 2000Aktual Bauteile Und Umweltschutz Systeme, GmbhPourable vegetation soil substrate process for the production thereof and the use thereof
US6027639 *12 Jan 199822 Feb 2000Stormwater Treatment LlcSelf-cleaning siphon-actuated radial flow filter basket
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US90054496 Sep 201214 Apr 2015Embro CorporationUse of moss to reduce disinfection by-products in water treated with disinfectants
Classifications
U.S. Classification210/602
International ClassificationC02F3/32
Cooperative ClassificationY02W10/18, C02F3/327, C02F2101/10, C02F3/32, C02F2303/04, C02F2101/20, A01N65/00, C02F1/50, E04H4/1281, C02F3/10, C02F2103/42, Y02W10/15
European ClassificationC02F3/32B, C02F1/50, E04H4/12B, C02F3/10
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
16 Sep 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: EMBRO CORPORATION, MINNESOTA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KNIGHTON, DAVID R.;FIEGEL, VANCE D.;REEL/FRAME:024999/0318
Effective date: 20060927