Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
20 November 2019

Manduca sexta (tobacco hornworm (USA))

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Manduca sexta (Linnaeus, 1763)
Preferred Common Name
tobacco hornworm (USA)
Other Scientific Names
Macrosila carolina (Linnaeus) Clemens, 1839
Manduca carolina (Linnaeus) Hübner [1809]
Phlegethontius carolina (Linnaeus) Hübner [1819]
Phlegethontius sexta (Linnaeus) Kirby, 1892
Protoparce carolina (Linnaeus) Butler, 1876
Protoparce griseata Butler, 1875
Protoparce jamaicensis Butler, 1876
Protoparce leucoptera Rothschild and Jordan, 1903
Protoparce sexta (Linnaeus) Rothschild & Jordan, 1903
Protoparce sexta luciae Gehlen, 1928
Protoparce sexta peruviana Bryk, 1953
Protoparce sexta saliensis Kernbach, 1964
Sphinx caestri Blanchard, 1854
Sphinx carolina Linnaeus, 1764
Sphinx eurylochus Philippi, 1860
Sphinx lycopersici Boisduval, [1875]
Sphinx nicotianae Boisduval, [1875]
Sphinx paphus Cramer, 1779
Sphinx sexta Linnaeus, 1763
Sphinx tabaci Boisduval, [1875]
International Common Names
English
Carolina sphinx (USA)
hornworm, tobacco
tobacco worm
tomato sphinx
Spanish
cachudo del tabaco
cornudo del tabaco
gusano cachudo del tabaco
gusano cornudo del tabaco
gusano de cuerno del tabaco (Mexico)
gusano verde del tabaco
marandova
torito
French
sphinx du tabac
Portuguese
mandarova do fumo (Brazil)
Local Common Names
Turkey
mahmuzlu kurt
EPPO code
MANDSE (Manduca sexta)

Pictures

M. sexta adult: set specimen of the tobacco hornworm (male).
Adult male
M. sexta adult: set specimen of the tobacco hornworm (male).
©A.R. Pittaway
Resting fifth instar larva of M. sexta on Lycium.
Fifth instar larva
Resting fifth instar larva of M. sexta on Lycium.
©A.R. Pittaway
Pinned male moth of M. sexta. This individual is darker than normal as a result of being reared under cool conditions.
Adult male
Pinned male moth of M. sexta. This individual is darker than normal as a result of being reared under cool conditions.
©A.R. Pittaway
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert M. McPherson, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Robert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, bugwood.org
Manduca sexta
Robert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

The larvae are mainly nocturnal and prefer younger leaves, often stripping growing shoots, particularly in the final instar. Two or more healthy larvae can completely defoliate a tobacco plant, leaving only midribs and stem. During major infestations entire plantations may be defoliated. Severe damage most commonly occurs during late July and August in the USA. With heavy infestations of tomatoes, caterpillars may even feed on developing fruit, leaving large, open scars.

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Leaves/external feeding  
Plants/Whole plant/external feeding  

Prevention and Control

Chemical ControlMalathion, diazinon, carbaryl and fenitrothion have been used with great effect. In the southern USA it is recommended that hornworms on tobacco be treated with insecticides when infestation levels exceed the economic threshold of five or more large (2.5 cm or longer), unparasitized larvae, per 50 plants (North Carolina State University, 1998).Cultural ControlCultural practices are very important. Early planted tobacco, correct (not excessive) nitrogen fertilization, sucker control, stalk destruction, and autumn ploughing all help to reduce overwintering populations (Reagan et al., 1978). Additionally, certain cultivars of tobacco have been found to be resistant to M. sexta in the USA (Johnson, 1996).Field evaluation in North Carolina of a transgenic tobacco cultivar containing a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein gene demonstrated that damage by M. sexta remained below the economic threshold for the duration of the trial (Warren et al., 1992).Biological ControlThere are a number of natural enemies that help control hornworm populations, with two having been used in augmentative biological control programmes - the braconid Cotesia congregata, and the bacterium Bacillus sphingidis.

Impact

Early generations are potentially damaging to marketable tobacco in the southern USA, sometimes stripping entire plantations. Severe damage most commonly occurs during late July and August. Later generations feed after harvest on non-commercial suckers. Nevertheless, these later generations are commercially important as they produce overwintering pupae. With heavy infestations of tomatoes, caterpillars may even feed on developing fruit, leaving large, open scars.Field studies were conducted during 1981 in Maryland, USA, to determine the relationship between pest density and yield loss from artificial infestations of fourth and fifth instar larvae. At several growth stages of the tobacco cultivar Md. 872, yields declined as the number of larvae per plant, or the percentage of infested plants increased. The data showed that yield loss varied according to date of infestation and plant phenology; tobacco plants became more tolerant of infestations as they aged. Based on control costs, and the market value of Maryland tobacco at the time of the study, larval population levels capable of causing 1.8% yield loss justified treatment. Economic injury levels varied considerably with plant growth stage and distribution patterns of infestations (Kolodny-Hirsch and Harrison, 1986).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 20 November 2019

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation