US20150090452A1 - Shock mitigator - Google Patents
Shock mitigator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150090452A1 US20150090452A1 US14/039,146 US201314039146A US2015090452A1 US 20150090452 A1 US20150090452 A1 US 20150090452A1 US 201314039146 A US201314039146 A US 201314039146A US 2015090452 A1 US2015090452 A1 US 2015090452A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- shock
- mitigator
- assembly
- tool
- application
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E21B47/011—
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/11—Perforators; Permeators
- E21B43/119—Details, e.g. for locating perforating place or direction
- E21B43/1195—Replacement of drilling mud; decrease of undesirable shock waves
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B29/00—Cutting or destroying pipes, packers, plugs, or wire lines, located in boreholes or wells, e.g. cutting of damaged pipes, of windows; Deforming of pipes in boreholes or wells; Reconditioning of well casings while in the ground
- E21B29/02—Cutting or destroying pipes, packers, plugs, or wire lines, located in boreholes or wells, e.g. cutting of damaged pipes, of windows; Deforming of pipes in boreholes or wells; Reconditioning of well casings while in the ground by explosives or by thermal or chemical means
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/11—Perforators; Permeators
- E21B43/116—Gun or shaped-charge perforators
Definitions
- a variety of well access applications may be performed within the well with a host of different tools or measurement devices.
- providing downhole access to wells of such challenging architecture may require more than simply dropping a wireline into the well with the applicable tool located at the end thereof.
- a variety of isolating, perforating and stimulating applications may be employed in conjunction with completions operations.
- the described manner of perforating can be accompanied by a significant degree of ‘gun shock’. That is, as the gun is fired, high frequency vibrations at high g-forces may propagate through the gun and to adjacent tools. Once more, even after the primary event of firing, secondary ‘aftershock’ may ensue as the gun assembly is thrown about the well, rattling against the casing and any other downhole equipment.
- the cumulative effect of this gun shock may be to damage the overall gun assembly beyond repair after only a single use.
- electronics of assembly tools are likely to suffer solder joint and circuitry damage through both the initial wave of shock and subsequent downhole aftershock.
- the gun is often limited in terms of length and diameter so as to minimize the amount of shock damage to the overall assembly.
- reusable perforating guns are generally limited to under about 21 ⁇ 2 inches in diameter with a range or length spanning well under 20 or so perforating ports. These limitations constrain the total amount of explosive energy that the gun utilizes during any given perforating application.
- gun assembly damage attributable to gun shock may be kept to a minimum.
- the gun may be larger or of more flexible dimensions to allow for greater explosive energy during perforating, yet with gun shock mitigated by the shock absorber tool.
- shock absorber tools may be constructed of internal metal coils or springs that are unlikely to remain reliably effective after a single firing of the gun.
- redress of the assembly is required after every perforating application. That is, instead of being unable to reuse the assembly due to damaged electronics, reusability is now compromised due to the need to replace a shock absorber.
- efforts have been undertaken to anchor the gun to the well casing during perforating to minimize assembly damage. However, this is likely to lead to casing damage.
- a degree of assembly damage of one type is likely to be exchanged for damage to another equipment feature. All in all, the operator is ultimately left with the undesirable option of deciding whether to compromise such equipment features or to use a smaller gun and compromise perforating application options.
- a shock mitigator is provided that may be beneficial for use in downhole perforating applications.
- the mitigator includes separate members adjacent one another with a plurality of shock mitigating implements at an interface therebetween. That is, the implements may serve to secure the members together. Additionally, a line such as a telemetric or power supply line may be routed through the interface along a recess that is provided into a surface of at least one of the members.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of a perforating gun assembly with an embodiment of a shock mitigator incorporated therein.
- FIG. 2A is a partially exploded sectional view of the shock mitigator of FIG. 1 with recess for accommodating a line therein.
- FIG. 2B is a front sectional view of the shock mitigator of FIG. 2A revealing an offset nature of shock mitigating implements to accommodate the recess.
- FIG. 3 is an overview of an oilfield with a well accommodating the gun assembly and mitigator of FIG. 1 therein.
- FIG. 4 is an enlarged view of the assembly of FIG. 3 during a perforating application.
- FIG. 5 is a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of employing a gun assembly with shock mitigator for a perforating application in a well.
- Embodiments are described with reference to certain downhole line conveyance applications.
- a wireline perforating application in a vertical well is shown.
- other forms of downhole shock inducing applications may take advantage of shock mitigating embodiments described herein.
- wireline perforating applications that utilize tractoring equipment through deviated well sections may benefit from such a shock mitigator.
- a line may traverse a recessed interface therebetween such that power and/or communication may extend therebeyond, for example, to the perforating gun of the assembly.
- FIG. 1 a side view of a perforating gun assembly 100 is shown with an embodiment of a shock mitigator 101 incorporated therein.
- the mitigator 101 is located between a perforating gun 175 and a housing 130 for shock sensitive components such as electronics. So, for example, where the firing of the gun 175 may induce several g's of force, the shock thereof is largely attenuated by the mitigator 101 before reaching the more sensitive electronics of the housing 130 .
- a host of instrumentation, gauges and other devices associated with downhole applications may be secured at the housing 130 . Indeed, protecting sensitive devices such as centralizers, processors, motor or telemetry tools, etc. may be achieved in this manner, irrespective of their electronic nature.
- the shock mitigator 101 may absorb up to half or more of the bi-directional shock-related energy from the gun 175 (i.e. whether tensile or compressive).
- the gun 175 itself may be of greater size, emitting greater energy, yet with less damaging shock related effects on tools and components located at the housing 130 or any other location opposite the mitigator 101 relative the gun 175 .
- the gun 175 may exceed about 2.5-3 inches in outer diameter. Specifically, the gun 175 may be a 33 ⁇ 8 inch outer diameter gun. Further, the gun 175 may span over 9 feet in length. However, other even larger (or smaller) gun types may be utilized in conjunction with the mitigator 101 . Further, the mitigator 101 is constructed with a plurality of shock mitigating implements 160 that extend into a body thereof. Yet, with added reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B , the implements 160 are positioned such that a line 201 may nevertheless traverse the mitigator 101 and reach the gun 175 .
- the intervening mitagator 101 does not present an obstacle to the line 201 reaching the depicted head 150 (again see FIGS. 2A-2B ).
- the shock mitigator 101 is 20 - 30 inches in length with an outer diameter of between about 1-2 inches. Further, it may be rated to effectively operate at pressures of up to between about 10,000-20,000 PSI and temperatures of 300-400° F. Of course, in other embodiments, a host of different dimensions and architecture may be employed for the mitigator 101 , depending on the type of gun 175 and total energy of the perforating application.
- a crossover adapter 140 may be provided for coupling of the mitigator 101 to the electronic housing 130 or other portions of the overall assembly 100 .
- the adapter 140 is configured with an intentional weakpoint.
- the weakpoint may be intentionally broken through conventional techniques such as in response to the assembly 100 becoming stuck downhole.
- Deploying the assembly 100 may be directed through a conventional wireline cable 110 .
- the cable 110 may be slickline or other suitable form of conveyance.
- other non-perforating shock-inducing applications such as mechanical packer or plug setting, may be carried out by tools below the shock mitigator 101 .
- the cable 110 is coupled to cable head 120 where it is integrated with the electronics housing 130 .
- wire leads, fiber optics or any other power or telemetry may ultimately reach, and extend beyond, the shock mitigator 101 as described above.
- at least one line 201 may emerge beyond the mitigator 101 as detailed further below.
- FIGS. 2A and 2B different sectional views of the shock mitigator 101 of FIG. 1 are depicted.
- FIG. 2A is a partially exploded sectional view of the shock mitigator 101 with a recess 200 for accommodating the above noted line 201 therein.
- FIG. 2B is a front sectional view of the mitigator 101 of FIG. 2A revealing an offset nature of shock mitigating implements 160 so as to readily accommodate the recess 200 .
- the shock mitigator 101 is made up of two separate interfacing members 225 , 250 .
- inner 225 and outer 250 cylindrical members are utilized with one 225 configured to rest internal of the other 250 .
- other architectural forms and/or alternate types of interfacing may be employed.
- an interface 230 is present between the members 225 , 250 .
- the members 225 , 250 are held together by a plurality of shock mitigating implements 160 as alluded to hereinabove.
- each shock mitigating implement 160 is provided through orifices 260 , 261 of each member 225 , 250 .
- each implement 160 may be of a shock responsive construction.
- each implement 160 may include an elastomeric tubing 245 , perhaps of 10-15 durometer hardness with a bolt 240 therethrough.
- the tubing 245 may be a conventional synthetic rubber.
- the members 225 , 250 may be reliably held together with shock-responsive attenuation through the implements 160 .
- such architecture may encourage propagation of mechanical impulses through the shock mitigator 101 with an overall z-axis acceleration from gun shots reduced by as much as half.
- the locations of the implements 160 are arranged such that an uninterrupted corridor is provided where a recess 200 into one of the members 225 is provided so as to accommodate the above referenced line 201 .
- the linear recess 200 is provided in the outer surface of the inner member 225 .
- the recess 200 may be at the inner surface of the outer member 250 .
- the recess 200 may even be defined by both members 225 , 250 having a partial recess into corresponding surfaces aligned at the interface 230 (see FIG. 2B ).
- the particular construction selected for the recess 200 may be a matter of manufacturability. In this regard, a conventional grease may be used at the recess 200 and/or the interface 230 .
- the noted interface 230 between the members 225 , 250 is readily visible. However, in certain embodiments the amount of space between the members 225 , 250 may be more negligible in appearance. Nevertheless, the interface 230 in combination with the shock mitigating implements 160 may be sufficient to provide the degree of shock attenuation as described above.
- the offset nature of the implements 160 may be more apparent.
- one implement 160 is shown slightly to the left of the recess 200 and line 201 . This is consistent with the row 265 of implements 160 to the left of the recess 200 and line 201 of FIG. 2A .
- a row 267 of implements to the right of the recess 200 and line 201 are also depicted in FIG. 2A such that the noted uninterrupted corridor is provided for the recess 200 and line 201 .
- a practical manner of manufacture is provided that does not require winding about a variety of implement locations 160 in order to provide an electric power or telemetric line 201 through the mitigator 101 .
- FIG. 3 an overview of an oilfield 300 is shown with a well 380 traversing various formation layers 390 , 395 .
- the well 380 also accommodates the gun assembly 100 with shock mitigator 101 as detailed hereinabove.
- a perforating gun 175 and electronics housing 130 are shown separated by the mitgator 101 .
- shock resulting from use of the gun 175 to perforate the casing 385 that defines the well 380 may be ‘mitigated’ to a degree.
- some of the more sensitive components of the electronics housing 130 may remain unharmed by the perforating application.
- the well 380 is vertical and the assembly 100 lowered thereinto via conventional wireline 110 .
- the well 380 may be deviated and assembly features such as tractoring tools may be incorporated into the assembly 100 . Nevertheless, in such circumstances, these types of tools may also be safeguarded by positioning of the shock mitigator 101 between such tools and the gun 175 .
- a wireline perforating application is run by deploying the assembly 100 via conventional wireline equipment 325 .
- a mobile truck 330 with reel 340 is provided to the oilfield 300 where a rig 350 is available for supporting conveyance of the wireline 110 and assembly 100 past a well head 360 and into the well.
- FIG. 3 also reveals a control unit 375 at the truck 330 for directing the perforating application.
- power and/or communications between the surface and the assembly 100 may help monitor and direct the application.
- gauges, monitors or actuators of the electronics housing 130 may communicate with the control unit 375 during an application.
- the architecture of the shock mitigator 101 also allows for such power, telemetry or communications to take place between the gun 175 and the control unit 375 as detailed hereinabove. So, for example, real-time triggering and other interfacing between the surface and the gun 175 may be available to an operator during and throughout the application.
- FIG. 4 an enlarged view of the assembly 100 of FIG. 3 is shown during a perforating application. More specifically, with the gun 175 positioned at a production region 495 of the formation 395 , it may be triggered to form perforations 400 as shown. As indicated above, this triggering may be achieved by way of a signal from surface over a line 201 that reaches all the way to the gun 175 or head 150 thereof (see FIGS. 2A and 2B ). That is, the intervening shock mitigator 101 does not serve as an impediment to such real-time signal and/or power capacity between the surface and the gun 175 . Thus, effective, more tightly regulated perforations 400 through the casing 385 may be formed via direct surface control.
- the shock mitigator 101 is constructed in a manner that readily accommodates a communication line 201 therethrough as indicated above. Furthermore, the mitigator 101 may be sized and tailored in light of the gun 175 or other shock inducing tool to be utilized. For example, as indicated above, the mitigator 101 may be architecturally tailored to accommodate a gun 175 exceeding about 9 feet in length and 3 inches in diameter while reducing shock reaching the electronics housing 130 by about half.
- FIG. 5 a flow-chart is depicted summarizing an embodiment of employing a shock inducing assembly with a mitigator as detailed herein.
- the assembly may be a perforating gun assembly as detailed herein.
- a plug setting or other high g-force application assembly may also benefit from the mitigator and techniques described.
- the assembly is deployed into the well and at the same time, power and/or data communication between the shock inducing tool of the assembly may be maintained as indicated at 545 . As detailed hereinabove, this is a result of an uninterrupted recess or channel through an interface of the mitigator that may be used to accommodate a communication line.
- the communication line may traverse the mitigator but not necessarily reach the surface, for example, where the line is run only between a particular instrument of the housing 130 and the gun 175 of FIG. 4 .
- such tools or instrumentation of the housing 130 or other location at the opposite side of the mitigator relative the shock inducing tool are substantially safeguarded. Indeed, as indicated at 565 , the shock inducing application may take place and yet, as indicated at 585 , these shock sensitive components may be reliably re-used.
- Embodiments described hereinabove include a shock mitigator that may be repeatably utilized without undue concern over replacing or refurbishing mitigator parts after every use of the associated perforating gun assembly.
- larger guns and more flexible perforating application parameters may be utilized without concern over damage to other associated electronic equipment as well.
- the shock mitigator is configured in such a manner as to accommodate a line for electronic and/or telemetric capacity therethrough. That is, not only is damage to nearby electronics substantially avoided, but the gun itself may even be communicatively responsive regardless of the intervening mitigator. Therefore, flexibility in terms of perforating application parameters may be further enhanced.
Abstract
An assembly with a shock inducing tool and shock sensitive components. The assembly includes a shock mitigator that is constructed in a manner that allows a communication line to stretch across an interface of the mitigator between a housing for the components and the shock inducing tool. So, for example, where the tool is a perforating gun, power and/or communication with the tool need not be sacrificed for in exchange for safeguarding electronic components of the housing with the mitigator.
Description
- Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As a result, over the years well architecture has become more sophisticated where appropriate in order to help enhance access to underground hydrocarbon reserves. For example, as opposed to wells of limited depth, it is not uncommon to find hydrocarbon wells exceeding 30,000 feet in depth. Furthermore, as opposed to remaining entirely vertical, today's hydrocarbon wells often include deviated or horizontal sections aimed at targeting particular underground reserves.
- While such well depths and architecture may increase the likelihood of accessing underground hydrocarbons, other challenges are presented in terms of well management and the maximization of hydrocarbon recovery from such wells. For example, during the life of a well, a variety of well access applications may be performed within the well with a host of different tools or measurement devices. However, providing downhole access to wells of such challenging architecture may require more than simply dropping a wireline into the well with the applicable tool located at the end thereof. Indeed, a variety of isolating, perforating and stimulating applications may be employed in conjunction with completions operations.
- In the case of perforating, different zones of the well may be outfitted with packers and other hardware, in part for sake of zonal isolation. Thus, wireline or other conveyance may be directed to a given zone and a gun assembly with related and/or controlling tools employed to create perforation tunnels through the well casing. As a result, perforations may be formed into the surrounding formation, ultimately enhancing recovery therefrom.
- The described manner of perforating can be accompanied by a significant degree of ‘gun shock’. That is, as the gun is fired, high frequency vibrations at high g-forces may propagate through the gun and to adjacent tools. Once more, even after the primary event of firing, secondary ‘aftershock’ may ensue as the gun assembly is thrown about the well, rattling against the casing and any other downhole equipment.
- The cumulative effect of this gun shock may be to damage the overall gun assembly beyond repair after only a single use. For example, electronics of assembly tools are likely to suffer solder joint and circuitry damage through both the initial wave of shock and subsequent downhole aftershock. With this in mind, the gun is often limited in terms of length and diameter so as to minimize the amount of shock damage to the overall assembly. Specifically, reusable perforating guns are generally limited to under about 2½ inches in diameter with a range or length spanning well under 20 or so perforating ports. These limitations constrain the total amount of explosive energy that the gun utilizes during any given perforating application. Thus, gun assembly damage attributable to gun shock may be kept to a minimum.
- Of course, placing constraints on the gun as noted above also limits operator application options when utilizing the gun assembly. That is, it stands to reason that keeping the gun at or below 2½ inches in diameter in order to effectively limit the amount of gun shock also limits the perforating application itself. So, for example, an operator may seek a variety of application options in order to enhance perforation depth, profile or other characteristics. However, to the extent that these options would require a larger amount of explosive or different shaped charge profile than may be accommodated by a 2½ inch diameter gun, such options would be unavailable.
- Compounding matters is the fact that the described constraints are not full proof. That is, placing such dimensional limitations on the gun is directed at preventing damage to adjacent gun assembly tools, thereby allowing the gun to be continually reused. However, the overall assembly continues to suffer some degree of shock related damage over time, regardless of these dimensional limitations. Thus, as a practical matter, for sake of ensuring reliability, it is unlikely that the gun would be utilized more than 100 times or so before a complete redressing of the assembly. The end result is a gun of significantly intentional limited capabilities that is still going to require a workover at some point.
- With these gun limitations in mind, other efforts have been undertaken to help address the issue of gun shock. For example, certain shock absorber-like tools have been developed for incorporation into the gun assembly. Thus, in theory, the gun may be larger or of more flexible dimensions to allow for greater explosive energy during perforating, yet with gun shock mitigated by the shock absorber tool.
- Unfortunately, shock absorber tools may be constructed of internal metal coils or springs that are unlikely to remain reliably effective after a single firing of the gun. As a result, redress of the assembly is required after every perforating application. That is, instead of being unable to reuse the assembly due to damaged electronics, reusability is now compromised due to the need to replace a shock absorber. Similarly, efforts have been undertaken to anchor the gun to the well casing during perforating to minimize assembly damage. However, this is likely to lead to casing damage. Once again, a degree of assembly damage of one type is likely to be exchanged for damage to another equipment feature. All in all, the operator is ultimately left with the undesirable option of deciding whether to compromise such equipment features or to use a smaller gun and compromise perforating application options.
- A shock mitigator is provided that may be beneficial for use in downhole perforating applications. The mitigator includes separate members adjacent one another with a plurality of shock mitigating implements at an interface therebetween. That is, the implements may serve to secure the members together. Additionally, a line such as a telemetric or power supply line may be routed through the interface along a recess that is provided into a surface of at least one of the members.
-
FIG. 1 is a side view of a perforating gun assembly with an embodiment of a shock mitigator incorporated therein. -
FIG. 2A is a partially exploded sectional view of the shock mitigator ofFIG. 1 with recess for accommodating a line therein. -
FIG. 2B is a front sectional view of the shock mitigator ofFIG. 2A revealing an offset nature of shock mitigating implements to accommodate the recess. -
FIG. 3 is an overview of an oilfield with a well accommodating the gun assembly and mitigator ofFIG. 1 therein. -
FIG. 4 is an enlarged view of the assembly ofFIG. 3 during a perforating application. -
FIG. 5 is a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of employing a gun assembly with shock mitigator for a perforating application in a well. - Embodiments are described with reference to certain downhole line conveyance applications. In particular, a wireline perforating application in a vertical well is shown. However, other forms of downhole shock inducing applications may take advantage of shock mitigating embodiments described herein. For example, wireline perforating applications that utilize tractoring equipment through deviated well sections may benefit from such a shock mitigator. Regardless, so long as the shock mitigatior is of a type utilizing adjacent members, a line may traverse a recessed interface therebetween such that power and/or communication may extend therebeyond, for example, to the perforating gun of the assembly.
- Referring now to
FIG. 1 , a side view of a perforatinggun assembly 100 is shown with an embodiment of ashock mitigator 101 incorporated therein. In the embodiment shown, themitigator 101 is located between aperforating gun 175 and ahousing 130 for shock sensitive components such as electronics. So, for example, where the firing of thegun 175 may induce several g's of force, the shock thereof is largely attenuated by themitigator 101 before reaching the more sensitive electronics of thehousing 130. For example, a host of instrumentation, gauges and other devices associated with downhole applications may be secured at thehousing 130. Indeed, protecting sensitive devices such as centralizers, processors, motor or telemetry tools, etc. may be achieved in this manner, irrespective of their electronic nature. - As detailed further below, the
shock mitigator 101 may absorb up to half or more of the bi-directional shock-related energy from the gun 175 (i.e. whether tensile or compressive). Thus, thegun 175 itself may be of greater size, emitting greater energy, yet with less damaging shock related effects on tools and components located at thehousing 130 or any other location opposite themitigator 101 relative thegun 175. - In the embodiment shown, the
gun 175 may exceed about 2.5-3 inches in outer diameter. Specifically, thegun 175 may be a 3⅜ inch outer diameter gun. Further, thegun 175 may span over 9 feet in length. However, other even larger (or smaller) gun types may be utilized in conjunction with themitigator 101. Further, themitigator 101 is constructed with a plurality of shock mitigating implements 160 that extend into a body thereof. Yet, with added reference toFIGS. 2A and 2B , theimplements 160 are positioned such that aline 201 may nevertheless traverse themitigator 101 and reach thegun 175. So, for example, where thegun 175 includes ahead 150 with capacity for electronic triggering of perforating throughports 180, the interveningmitagator 101 does not present an obstacle to theline 201 reaching the depicted head 150 (again seeFIGS. 2A-2B ). - In one embodiment, the
shock mitigator 101 is 20-30 inches in length with an outer diameter of between about 1-2 inches. Further, it may be rated to effectively operate at pressures of up to between about 10,000-20,000 PSI and temperatures of 300-400° F. Of course, in other embodiments, a host of different dimensions and architecture may be employed for themitigator 101, depending on the type ofgun 175 and total energy of the perforating application. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 1 , acrossover adapter 140 may be provided for coupling of themitigator 101 to theelectronic housing 130 or other portions of theoverall assembly 100. In the embodiment shown, theadapter 140 is configured with an intentional weakpoint. However, due to themitigator 101 the possibility of unintentional weakpoint breakage as a result of gun shock is minimized Rather, the weakpoint may be intentionally broken through conventional techniques such as in response to theassembly 100 becoming stuck downhole. - Deploying the
assembly 100, triggering a perforating application or even breaking a weakpoint as noted above may be directed through aconventional wireline cable 110. Of course, in other embodiments thecable 110 may be slickline or other suitable form of conveyance. Similarly, other non-perforating shock-inducing applications, such as mechanical packer or plug setting, may be carried out by tools below theshock mitigator 101. Regardless, as shown inFIG. 1 , thecable 110 is coupled tocable head 120 where it is integrated with theelectronics housing 130. Thus, wire leads, fiber optics or any other power or telemetry may ultimately reach, and extend beyond, theshock mitigator 101 as described above. Specifically, at least oneline 201 may emerge beyond themitigator 101 as detailed further below. - Referring now to
FIGS. 2A and 2B different sectional views of theshock mitigator 101 ofFIG. 1 are depicted. Specifically,FIG. 2A is a partially exploded sectional view of theshock mitigator 101 with arecess 200 for accommodating the abovenoted line 201 therein.FIG. 2B on the other hand is a front sectional view of themitigator 101 ofFIG. 2A revealing an offset nature of shock mitigating implements 160 so as to readily accommodate therecess 200. - With reference to
FIG. 2A , theshock mitigator 101 is made up of twoseparate interfacing members FIG. 2B , aninterface 230 is present between themembers members - In the embodiment shown, each shock mitigating implement 160 is provided through
orifices member elastomeric tubing 245, perhaps of 10-15 durometer hardness with abolt 240 therethrough. Specifically, thetubing 245 may be a conventional synthetic rubber. Thus, themembers implements 160. As a practical matter, such architecture may encourage propagation of mechanical impulses through theshock mitigator 101 with an overall z-axis acceleration from gun shots reduced by as much as half. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 2A , the locations of theimplements 160 are arranged such that an uninterrupted corridor is provided where arecess 200 into one of themembers 225 is provided so as to accommodate the above referencedline 201. In the embodiment shown, thelinear recess 200 is provided in the outer surface of theinner member 225. However, in other embodiments, therecess 200 may be at the inner surface of theouter member 250. Indeed, therecess 200 may even be defined by bothmembers FIG. 2B ). The particular construction selected for therecess 200 may be a matter of manufacturability. In this regard, a conventional grease may be used at therecess 200 and/or theinterface 230. - As shown in
FIG. 2B , thenoted interface 230 between themembers members interface 230 in combination with the shock mitigating implements 160 may be sufficient to provide the degree of shock attenuation as described above. - Additionally, in the view of
FIG. 2B , the offset nature of theimplements 160 may be more apparent. For example, at the particular cross-section of themitigator 101 that is shown, one implement 160 is shown slightly to the left of therecess 200 andline 201. This is consistent with therow 265 ofimplements 160 to the left of therecess 200 andline 201 ofFIG. 2A . Similarly, arow 267 of implements to the right of therecess 200 andline 201 are also depicted inFIG. 2A such that the noted uninterrupted corridor is provided for therecess 200 andline 201. As a result, a practical manner of manufacture is provided that does not require winding about a variety of implementlocations 160 in order to provide an electric power ortelemetric line 201 through themitigator 101. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , an overview of anoilfield 300 is shown with a well 380 traversing various formation layers 390, 395. The well 380 also accommodates thegun assembly 100 withshock mitigator 101 as detailed hereinabove. Specifically, a perforatinggun 175 andelectronics housing 130 are shown separated by themitgator 101. Thus, shock resulting from use of thegun 175 to perforate thecasing 385 that defines the well 380 may be ‘mitigated’ to a degree. As a result, some of the more sensitive components of theelectronics housing 130 may remain unharmed by the perforating application. - In the embodiment of
FIG. 3 , the well 380 is vertical and theassembly 100 lowered thereinto viaconventional wireline 110. However, in other embodiments, the well 380 may be deviated and assembly features such as tractoring tools may be incorporated into theassembly 100. Nevertheless, in such circumstances, these types of tools may also be safeguarded by positioning of theshock mitigator 101 between such tools and thegun 175. Further, in the embodiment shown, a wireline perforating application is run by deploying theassembly 100 viaconventional wireline equipment 325. Specifically, amobile truck 330 withreel 340 is provided to theoilfield 300 where arig 350 is available for supporting conveyance of thewireline 110 andassembly 100 past awell head 360 and into the well. -
FIG. 3 also reveals acontrol unit 375 at thetruck 330 for directing the perforating application. For example, power and/or communications between the surface and theassembly 100 may help monitor and direct the application. Specifically, gauges, monitors or actuators of theelectronics housing 130 may communicate with thecontrol unit 375 during an application. Further, the architecture of theshock mitigator 101 also allows for such power, telemetry or communications to take place between thegun 175 and thecontrol unit 375 as detailed hereinabove. So, for example, real-time triggering and other interfacing between the surface and thegun 175 may be available to an operator during and throughout the application. - Referring now to
FIG. 4 , an enlarged view of theassembly 100 ofFIG. 3 is shown during a perforating application. More specifically, with thegun 175 positioned at aproduction region 495 of theformation 395, it may be triggered to formperforations 400 as shown. As indicated above, this triggering may be achieved by way of a signal from surface over aline 201 that reaches all the way to thegun 175 orhead 150 thereof (seeFIGS. 2A and 2B ). That is, the interveningshock mitigator 101 does not serve as an impediment to such real-time signal and/or power capacity between the surface and thegun 175. Thus, effective, more tightlyregulated perforations 400 through thecasing 385 may be formed via direct surface control. - Continuing with reference to
FIG. 4 , with added reference toFIGS. 2A and 2B , theshock mitigator 101 is constructed in a manner that readily accommodates acommunication line 201 therethrough as indicated above. Furthermore, themitigator 101 may be sized and tailored in light of thegun 175 or other shock inducing tool to be utilized. For example, as indicated above, themitigator 101 may be architecturally tailored to accommodate agun 175 exceeding about 9 feet in length and 3 inches in diameter while reducing shock reaching theelectronics housing 130 by about half. - Referring now to
FIG. 5 , a flow-chart is depicted summarizing an embodiment of employing a shock inducing assembly with a mitigator as detailed herein. The assembly may be a perforating gun assembly as detailed herein. Although, a plug setting or other high g-force application assembly may also benefit from the mitigator and techniques described. Regardless, as indicated at 525, the assembly is deployed into the well and at the same time, power and/or data communication between the shock inducing tool of the assembly may be maintained as indicated at 545. As detailed hereinabove, this is a result of an uninterrupted recess or channel through an interface of the mitigator that may be used to accommodate a communication line. - In one embodiment, the communication line may traverse the mitigator but not necessarily reach the surface, for example, where the line is run only between a particular instrument of the
housing 130 and thegun 175 ofFIG. 4 . Whatever the case, such tools or instrumentation of thehousing 130 or other location at the opposite side of the mitigator relative the shock inducing tool are substantially safeguarded. Indeed, as indicated at 565, the shock inducing application may take place and yet, as indicated at 585, these shock sensitive components may be reliably re-used. - Embodiments described hereinabove include a shock mitigator that may be repeatably utilized without undue concern over replacing or refurbishing mitigator parts after every use of the associated perforating gun assembly. Thus, larger guns and more flexible perforating application parameters may be utilized without concern over damage to other associated electronic equipment as well. In fact, the shock mitigator is configured in such a manner as to accommodate a line for electronic and/or telemetric capacity therethrough. That is, not only is damage to nearby electronics substantially avoided, but the gun itself may even be communicatively responsive regardless of the intervening mitigator. Therefore, flexibility in terms of perforating application parameters may be further enhanced.
- The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
Claims (20)
1. A shock mitigator comprising:
a first member;
a second member adjacent said first member;
a plurality of shock mitigating implements disposed at an interface between said members and securing said members together; and
a line traversing the interface between said members along a recess into a surface of at least one of said members.
2. The mitigator of claim 1 wherein said shock mitigating implements are of an offset arrangement to allow the recess to be a linear uninterrupted recess.
3. The mitigator of claim 1 wherein the line is one of an electrical line and a fiber optic line.
4. The mitigator of claim 1 wherein at least one of said plurality of shock mitigating implements comprises:
a bolt; and
elastomeric tubing about said bolt for contacting each of said members.
5. The mitigator of claim 5 wherein said elastomeric tubing is a synthetic rubber of between about 10 and about 15 durometer hardness.
6. The mitigator of claim 1 wherein said members are of a length of between about 20 inches and about 30 inches.
7. The mitigator of claim 1 wherein said first member is an outer cylindrical member and said second member is an inner cylindrical member disposed within said outer cylindrical member with the interface therebetween.
8. The mitigator of claim 7 wherein said outer cylindrical member is between about 1 and about 2 inches in outer diameter.
9. A shock inducing application assembly comprising:
a shock sensitive component housing;
a shock inducing tool; and
a shock mitigator disposed between and coupled to each of said housing and said tool, said mitigator comprising adjacent members with an interface therebetween to accommodate a communication line therethrough and a plurality of shock mitigating implements securing the members together.
10. The assembly of claim 9 wherein said shock inducing tool is one of a perforating gun and a plug setting tool.
11. The assembly of claim 10 wherein the perforating gun exceeds about 2.5 inches in outer diameter.
12. The assembly of claim 10 wherein the perforating gun exceeds about 9 feet in length.
13. The assembly of claim 9 wherein a component of said housing is selected from a group consisting of instrumentation, gauges, electronics, a processor, a monitor, an actuator, a centralizing tool, a telemetry tool and a motor tool.
14. The assembly of claim 9 further comprising tractor equipment to aid in advancement thereof through a well.
15. The assembly of claim 9 further comprising a downhole line for deployment thereof into a well.
16. The assembly of claim 15 wherein said downhole line is one of a wireline cable and slickline.
17. The assembly of claim 15 wherein said downhole line is communicatively coupled to equipment at a surface of an oilfield accommodating the well and to said shock inducing tool through the communication line.
18. A method of performing a shock inducing application in a well, the method comprising:
deploying a shock inducing tool of an assembly into the well;
communicating from equipment at an oilfield surface accommodating the well to the tool;
carrying out the shock inducing application; and
absorbing shock-related energy of the application to safeguard shock sensitive components of the assembly during said carrying out of the application.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the application is one of a perforating application and a plug setting tool application.
20. The method of claim 18 further comprising breaking the assembly at a weakpoint thereof after said carrying out of the application.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/039,146 US9611726B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2013-09-27 | Shock mitigator |
MYPI2016701053A MY177240A (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2014-09-22 | Shock mitigator |
GB1604772.2A GB2536137B (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2014-09-22 | Shock mitigator |
PCT/US2014/056711 WO2015047923A1 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2014-09-22 | Shock mitigator |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/039,146 US9611726B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2013-09-27 | Shock mitigator |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150090452A1 true US20150090452A1 (en) | 2015-04-02 |
US9611726B2 US9611726B2 (en) | 2017-04-04 |
Family
ID=52738958
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/039,146 Active 2034-08-27 US9611726B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2013-09-27 | Shock mitigator |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9611726B2 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2536137B (en) |
MY (1) | MY177240A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015047923A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130246029A1 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Technique for establishing predictive reach through a deviated well |
EP3112584A1 (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2017-01-04 | Services Pétroliers Schlumberger | System and method for shock mitigation |
US9611726B2 (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2017-04-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Shock mitigator |
CN111502610A (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2020-08-07 | 西安石油大学 | Mechanical vibration damper for perforating section pipe column |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018068067A1 (en) * | 2016-10-07 | 2018-04-12 | Detnet South Africa (Pty) Ltd | Conductive shock tube |
Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2266342A (en) * | 1941-02-06 | 1941-12-16 | Lane Wells Co | Gun perforator |
US2266352A (en) * | 1941-01-27 | 1941-12-16 | Lane Wells Co | Gun perforator |
US2326114A (en) * | 1941-12-08 | 1943-08-10 | Lane Wells Co | Gun perforator |
US3221655A (en) * | 1963-06-26 | 1965-12-07 | Dresser Ind | Selective shaped charge gun |
US3327793A (en) * | 1964-11-19 | 1967-06-27 | Dresser Ind | Multiple-shot bullet gun for perforating well casing |
US4286217A (en) * | 1979-02-01 | 1981-08-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Device for electrode-type electrical logging tools and tool incorporating said device |
US4633945A (en) * | 1984-12-03 | 1987-01-06 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Permanent completion tubing conveyed perforating system |
US4706744A (en) * | 1986-08-22 | 1987-11-17 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Wireline tool connector |
US4817718A (en) * | 1987-09-08 | 1989-04-04 | Baker Oil Tools, Inc. | Hydraulically activated firing head for well perforating guns |
US5095993A (en) * | 1989-12-15 | 1992-03-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Anchor apparatus for a tubing and wireline conveyed method and apparatus |
US5109921A (en) * | 1991-04-29 | 1992-05-05 | Halliburton Company | Controlled weak point for wireline cable |
US5201814A (en) * | 1992-01-23 | 1993-04-13 | Conoco Inc. | Breakaway coupling device |
US20020148611A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2002-10-17 | Williger Gabor P. | One trip completion method and assembly |
US6571046B1 (en) * | 1999-09-23 | 2003-05-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Protector system for fiber optic system components in subsurface applications |
US20040104029A1 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2004-06-03 | Martin Andrew J. | Intelligent perforating well system and method |
US20100286800A1 (en) * | 2007-01-06 | 2010-11-11 | Lerche Nolan C | Tractor communication/control and select fire perforating switch simulations |
US20110017448A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2011-01-27 | Douglas Pipchuk | Zonal testing with the use of coiled tubing |
US20110150596A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Shear coupling assembly for use with rotary and reciprocating pumps |
US8397814B2 (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2013-03-19 | Halliburton Energy Serivces, Inc. | Perforating string with bending shock de-coupler |
US8397800B2 (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2013-03-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Perforating string with longitudinal shock de-coupler |
US20140260591A1 (en) * | 2012-12-01 | 2014-09-18 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Protection of Electronic Devices Used with Perforating Guns |
US20140305660A1 (en) * | 2013-04-10 | 2014-10-16 | Reeves Wireline Technologies Limited | Shock Absorber, Related Methods and Apparatuses |
US20140312752A1 (en) * | 2011-11-24 | 2014-10-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Longitudinal Absorber for Downhole Tool Chassis |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3923106A (en) | 1974-12-04 | 1975-12-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corp | Well bore perforating apparatus |
US5088557A (en) | 1990-03-15 | 1992-02-18 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Downhole pressure attenuation apparatus |
US7451819B2 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2008-11-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Openhole perforating |
US7661366B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2010-02-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Signal conducting detonating cord |
US8136608B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2012-03-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Mitigating perforating gun shock |
US9065201B2 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2015-06-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Electrical connector modules for wellbore devices and related assemblies |
US9611726B2 (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2017-04-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Shock mitigator |
-
2013
- 2013-09-27 US US14/039,146 patent/US9611726B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-09-22 WO PCT/US2014/056711 patent/WO2015047923A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-09-22 MY MYPI2016701053A patent/MY177240A/en unknown
- 2014-09-22 GB GB1604772.2A patent/GB2536137B/en active Active
Patent Citations (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2266352A (en) * | 1941-01-27 | 1941-12-16 | Lane Wells Co | Gun perforator |
US2266342A (en) * | 1941-02-06 | 1941-12-16 | Lane Wells Co | Gun perforator |
US2326114A (en) * | 1941-12-08 | 1943-08-10 | Lane Wells Co | Gun perforator |
US3221655A (en) * | 1963-06-26 | 1965-12-07 | Dresser Ind | Selective shaped charge gun |
US3327793A (en) * | 1964-11-19 | 1967-06-27 | Dresser Ind | Multiple-shot bullet gun for perforating well casing |
US4286217A (en) * | 1979-02-01 | 1981-08-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Device for electrode-type electrical logging tools and tool incorporating said device |
US4633945A (en) * | 1984-12-03 | 1987-01-06 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Permanent completion tubing conveyed perforating system |
US4706744A (en) * | 1986-08-22 | 1987-11-17 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Wireline tool connector |
US4817718A (en) * | 1987-09-08 | 1989-04-04 | Baker Oil Tools, Inc. | Hydraulically activated firing head for well perforating guns |
US5095993A (en) * | 1989-12-15 | 1992-03-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Anchor apparatus for a tubing and wireline conveyed method and apparatus |
US5109921A (en) * | 1991-04-29 | 1992-05-05 | Halliburton Company | Controlled weak point for wireline cable |
US5201814A (en) * | 1992-01-23 | 1993-04-13 | Conoco Inc. | Breakaway coupling device |
US6571046B1 (en) * | 1999-09-23 | 2003-05-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Protector system for fiber optic system components in subsurface applications |
US20020148611A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2002-10-17 | Williger Gabor P. | One trip completion method and assembly |
US20040104029A1 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2004-06-03 | Martin Andrew J. | Intelligent perforating well system and method |
US6837310B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2005-01-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Intelligent perforating well system and method |
US20100286800A1 (en) * | 2007-01-06 | 2010-11-11 | Lerche Nolan C | Tractor communication/control and select fire perforating switch simulations |
US20110017448A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2011-01-27 | Douglas Pipchuk | Zonal testing with the use of coiled tubing |
US20110150596A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Shear coupling assembly for use with rotary and reciprocating pumps |
US8397814B2 (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2013-03-19 | Halliburton Energy Serivces, Inc. | Perforating string with bending shock de-coupler |
US8397800B2 (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2013-03-19 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Perforating string with longitudinal shock de-coupler |
US20140290352A1 (en) * | 2011-06-16 | 2014-10-02 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Protection of Electronic Devices Used with Perforating Guns |
US20140312752A1 (en) * | 2011-11-24 | 2014-10-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Longitudinal Absorber for Downhole Tool Chassis |
US20140260591A1 (en) * | 2012-12-01 | 2014-09-18 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Protection of Electronic Devices Used with Perforating Guns |
US8978817B2 (en) * | 2012-12-01 | 2015-03-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Protection of electronic devices used with perforating guns |
US20140305660A1 (en) * | 2013-04-10 | 2014-10-16 | Reeves Wireline Technologies Limited | Shock Absorber, Related Methods and Apparatuses |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
"StimGun Technology", October 2000, pages 1-191. * |
Ager, Scott A, "IES Fast Speed Cauges", 3/2/09, pages 1-39. * |
IES, "Series 300, High Shock, High Speed Pressure Gauge", 2/2010, pages 1-2. * |
Robinson, "Polymer & Material Selection Guide", 2005, pages 1-10. * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130246029A1 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Technique for establishing predictive reach through a deviated well |
US9659113B2 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2017-05-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Technique for establishing predictive reach through a deviated well |
US9611726B2 (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2017-04-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Shock mitigator |
EP3112584A1 (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2017-01-04 | Services Pétroliers Schlumberger | System and method for shock mitigation |
US10246975B2 (en) | 2015-06-30 | 2019-04-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for shock mitigation |
US10975672B2 (en) | 2015-06-30 | 2021-04-13 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and method for shock mitigation |
CN111502610A (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2020-08-07 | 西安石油大学 | Mechanical vibration damper for perforating section pipe column |
CN111502610B (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2021-11-30 | 西安石油大学 | Mechanical vibration damper for perforating section pipe column |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2536137A (en) | 2016-09-07 |
GB2536137B (en) | 2020-03-25 |
MY177240A (en) | 2020-09-09 |
WO2015047923A1 (en) | 2015-04-02 |
US9611726B2 (en) | 2017-04-04 |
GB201604772D0 (en) | 2016-05-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9611726B2 (en) | Shock mitigator | |
RU2721039C2 (en) | Sensors located along drilling tool | |
EP2510190B1 (en) | Wirelessly actuated hydrostatic set module | |
US7159653B2 (en) | Spacer sub | |
US20160084048A1 (en) | Cohesively Enhanced Modular Perforating Gun | |
US8020634B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for supporting a downhole component in a downhole drilling tool | |
US10190394B2 (en) | Energy harvesting from a downhole jar | |
CN106068363B (en) | Packaging for electronics in downhole assemblies | |
CA2883072C (en) | Method for surveying drill holes, drilling arrangement, and borehole survey assembly | |
WO2014084868A1 (en) | Protection of electronic devices used with perforating guns | |
WO2017105434A1 (en) | Mitigation of cable damage during perforation | |
US10174605B2 (en) | Isolating mule shoe | |
EP3608500A1 (en) | Apparatus for operating in a borehole | |
US11199087B2 (en) | Module for housing components on a downhole tool | |
US10246974B2 (en) | Punch and cut system for tubing | |
US20120193090A1 (en) | Downhole sensor assembly | |
US10240453B2 (en) | Solid state phase change flasking for a downhole tool component | |
US10914162B2 (en) | Protective housing for electronics in downhole tools | |
US11555356B2 (en) | Downhole vibration and shock absorbing device | |
CA2946447C (en) | Drill string sections with interchangeable couplings | |
WO2016090110A1 (en) | Cable protector gauge carrier for reading reservoir pressure through cement | |
US11414981B2 (en) | Integrated gamma sensor container | |
US20050067169A1 (en) | Modular weight bar | |
US11808092B2 (en) | Electro-mechanical release tool and associated methods | |
Carpenter | Coiled-Tubing Telemetry Intervention in Shut-In Conditions |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SANGARE, FAHIRA;FULLER, JOHN E.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20131116 TO 20131118;REEL/FRAME:032338/0543 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |